Hi,
I'm mostly a systemd user myself, but have read through a reasonable
part of the documentation. So hopefully I can answer some of your questions.
On 07/06/2014 15:33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Let's take an example with keystone. Currently, there's the following
init.d sysv-rc script LSB
Hi,
src/sd-shutdown.h is licensed under LGPL-2.1+. Please include that
information in d/copyright.
I think it would also be good if there was an explicit license for the
Debian packaging.
Ansgar
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Package: libpam-systemd
Version: 208-6
Severity: normal
libpam-systemd has a dependency on systemd-sysv (or systemd-shim) to
ensure logind is available, but it has no dependency on dbus. However
if dbus is not installed, it cannot talk to logind...
systemd itself should probably also recommend
On 08/20/2014 10:12, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 at 13:24:34 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Two possible outcomes then
1/ Make systemd recommend/depend on dbus (recommend would probably be
sufficient)
According to the initial bug report, the base system is installed without
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: syst...@packages.debian.org, d...@packages.debian.org
Please increase the priority of dbus to important or standard (not sure
which): it is needed by systemd-logind. If dbus is not available,
systems running systemd will not spawn gettys on tty2-6 by default.
.
Otherwise ProtectSystem=full is broken (and treated as
ProtectSystem=false).
Ansgar
From: Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:38:07 +0200
Subject: Include additional directories in ProtectSystem
--- a/src/core/namespace.c
+++ b/src/core/namespace.c
@@ -371,7 +371,7
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes:
Am 13.09.2014 um 15:53 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Looking at v215, it seems as if starting cgmanager as part of the
installation messes up the running systemd state. When triggering
reboot, (i.e. poking /dev/initctl), I get the following:
Actually this
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes:
Am 18.09.2014 um 21:22 schrieb Sven Joachim:
This is exactly what I observe: before the upgrade /run/user was mounted
on a tmpfs, after the upgrade another tmpfs appeared mounted on
/run/user/1000, shadowing the files on /run/user. Unmounting that new
Hi,
Sebastian Oswald sebast...@rostwald.de writes:
When trying to upgrade systemd-packages from 208-8 systemd isn't
selected for upgrade, resulting in KDE and X11 to be removed:
Did you pin any packages? Please check /etc/apt/preferences and
/etc/apt/preferences.d/*.
Ansgar
Hi,
On 10/10/2014 12:58, Gert Wollny wrote:
currently in /etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf provided by the systemd
package ipv6 seems to be disabled by default i.e.
That is just a symlink to ../sysctl.conf; /etc/sysctl.conf is provided
by procps.
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
Package: systemd
Version: 215-5+b1
Priority: wishlist
Hi,
as discussed with Michael Biebl on IRC this morning, please consider
changing the init script integration: the status action should pass
--lines=0 to systemctl, i.e. /etc/init.d/${x} status should call
systemctl --lines=0 status ${x}.
Package: sysv-rc
Version: 2.88dsf-53.3
Priority: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
as discussed with Michael Biebl on IRC this morning, please consider
changing how invoke-rc.d forwards commands to systemctl: the status
action should pass --lines=0, i.e.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please raise the priority of dbus a bit further, from standard to
important. It turns out that there are several issues with not having
dbus around, stemming from systemd-logind not being available. Among
these are:
- No TTYs on VT 2-6.
- No handling of
Control: retitle -1 systemd: missing /dev/urandom makes postinst fail
Hi,
On 02/03/2015 11:59 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 02/03/2015 11:22 AM, Martin Wuertele wrote:
Setting up systemd (215-10) ...
Failed to open /dev/urandom: Function not implemented
dpkg: error processing package
Hi Marin,
please remember to also send replies to the bug report (I've not
forwarded your message).
The debootstrap log looks a bit more scary than I think it should, but
I'll take a look at only the systemd error:
On 02/03/2015 11:22 AM, Martin Wuertele wrote:
Setting up systemd (215-10) ...
Hi,
On 02/03/2015 10:39 AM, Martin Wuertele wrote:
When trying to debootstrap jessie on an RHEL7 / CENTOS7 (system is
running systemd 208 Release 11.el7_0.6) system for usage with lxc or
docker debootstrap fails due to systemd and systemd-sys:
dpkh: systemd-sysv: dependency problems, but
Hi,
Christian Seiler christ...@iwakd.de writes:
I've implemented both of these and attached a modified version of
the patch. Do you have any objections? If not, I'll ask for pre-
approval by the release team.
The load_sysv function also has a heuristic to guess whether the init
script support
Hi,
On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, Floris wrote:
I have installed the Debian Base system and add gnome-session, gdm,
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia and probably some other packages to get a
working gnome environment. Maybe coincidental, but none of these
packages recommends less. Only man-db and gzip
Hi,
On 03/30/2015 12:29 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hence the idea of systemd-extras -- everything which brings in large
dependencies and isn't needed for booting every system can go there.
systemd would Recommends: systemd-extras, but admins of embedded
machines etc. could remove/not install it.
Control: block 782993 by 152955
Hi,
the meaning of the force-reload action comes up again with systemd:
- systemctl implements force-reload as documented by LSB, that is
a service not running does *not* get started,
- the init script integration maps /etc/init.d/X force-reload to
Package: systemd
Version: 224-1
Severity: minor
systemd seems to need a newer version of mount that it currently depends on:
Aug 14 10:39:24 xyz swapon[457]: /sbin/swapon: invalid option -- 'o'
The fstab entry in question is
/dev/mapper/xyz-swap none swap sw 0 0
Ansgar
-- System
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes:
we currently have one commit in our jessie branch [1] and the jessie
point release 8.2 is about one month away.
Or in two weeks based on the current responses[2] which would mean a p-u
freeze next weekend.
Ansgar
[1]
Axel Beckert a...@debian.org writes:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 30.06.2015 um 17:52 schrieb Klaus Ethgen:
# CONFIG_FHANDLE is not set
E.g. that one is missing.
If you compile your own kernel, you should make sure all requirements
listed at [1] are met. I didn't check all other options, but
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes:
If 215-8 was working successfully, finding the faulty commit would
indeed be very helpful. If you know how to use git bisect, you could use
that to determine the commit. This will be a lengthy process though and
probably not something you want to do on a
Julian Wollrath jwollr...@web.de writes:
Am Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:24:02 +0200
schrieb martin f krafft madd...@debian.org:
You could also just use
find /etc/systemd/network --name \*.link --exec cp -pt
$DESTDIR/lib/systemd/network/ {} +
But that would assume, that findutils is installed.
On 07/15/2015 09:34 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
However, recently I found out about the
systemd-no-service-for-init-rcS-script lintian error, which triggers for
nbd-client. I'm afraid that if I create such a unit generator, this
would still trigger.
Is that correct? If so, is there another
Jens Georg writes:
> I was trying to run sane network scanning through socket activation, but
> with the provided saned.socket file systemd only listens on a v6 socket.
> I have to explicitly change ListenStream to 0.0.0.0:6656 to make it
> listen on v4.
Did you check if
Hi,
you mention
Copyright (c) 2006, 2008 Junio C Hamano
in d/copyright, but he doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere? Anyway,
this is a minor thing and the package is fine otherwise.
Ansgar
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Josh Triplett writes:
> I'd actually suggest *two* tiny packages: a systemd-journal-persistent
> package that ships /var/log/journal and provides/conflicts
> system-log-daemon, and a systemd-journal-transient package that
> pointedly doesn't ship /var/log/journal (or in the
Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 12:32:06 +0100 Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org>
> wrote:
>> machines.target is not enabled by default. This means machines
>> configured to start at boot with "machinectl enable " will
>&
Package: systemd-container
Version: 228-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
machines.target is not enabled by default. This means machines
configured to start at boot with "machinectl enable " will
actually not start unless one also enables machines.target manually.
Ansgar
-- System Information:
Debian
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 13:08 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 09.06.2016 um 12:40 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
> > I wonder if it would make sense to keep the three libraries in one
> > package then? All of them would be usually installed anyway should
> > systemd depend on them
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 03:17 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> One more comment:
>
> $ du -hs debian/libip*tc0/usr/*
> 36K debian/libip4tc0/usr/lib
> 88K debian/libip4tc0/usr/share
> 40K debian/libip6tc0/usr/lib
> 88K debian/libip6tc0/usr/share
> 16K debian/libiptc0/usr/lib
> 88K
Control: reassign -1 file-rc/0.8.17,sysv-rc/2.88dsf-59.3
Control: retitle -1 sysv-rc and file-rc: error when trying to install together
Ralf Treinen writes:
> Package: file-rc,init-system-helpers
This is actually a conflict between file-rc and sysv-rc. The one
between file-rc
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> This is the culprit:
>
> Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]: dev-mmcblk1p5.mount: Mount
> process exited, code=exited status=32
> Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]: Failed to mount
> /dev/mmcblk1p5.
>
> Your fstab has
>
> /
Josh Triplett writes:
> If systemd-logind just needs dbus to check for possible inhibitors,
> could systemd-logind simply ignore inhibitors without dbus?
systemd-logind failed to start if dbus isn't available (#772700). That's
why
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 18:27 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Could we add the Important: yes field to "init"? Having that makes a
> lot of sense to me.
To init or to its dependencies (systemd-sysv, sysvinit-core)? The
latter would not only warn when uninstalling all init systems, but also
when
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
As discussed in [1] I would like to make it possible for minimal
systems (mostly buildd chroots and application containers like Docker)
to not have to install an init system.
For this the "Essential: yes" field is moved from "init" to
Control: retitle -1 init: Move "Essential: yes" from init to init-system-helpers
Control: tag -1 - patch
Control: forcemerge -1 823501
I would like "init" to be optional in Debian 9 for chroot environments
and some uses of containers. A first step seems to be making "init" no
longer essential;
Package: init
Version:
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
Felipe Sateler writes:
> On 5 May 2016 at 10:05, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote:
>> As maintainer scripts call `invoke-rc.d` and `update-rc.d`
>> unconditionally, the package providing these scripts should be made
>> essential (i.e. add "Essent
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 14:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 09.07.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
> > Package: systemd-container
> > Version: 230-5
> >
> > nspawn fails to start the selected program. It appears to need
> > dbus, and Debian
> > is missing a Requires:. System has version
Michael Biebl writes:
> But now we have a different issue, ldd thinks, that liblz4 is in /lib.:
[...]
> This is because of merged-usr. This more or less renders the whole check
> useless once we build in a chroot which has been created with
> debootstrap --merged-usr
>
> Dunno, maybe we should
Michael Fritscher writes:
> The problem is that if the system is on battery both on going to
> suspend and waking up, in 90% of the cases the system goes into
> suspend immediately again (few seconds). On the second try it works.
> I didn't set the system to go into suspend after some time...
Do
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 16:45 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep:
> >
> > a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2)
> > b/ systemd has a Breaks/Replaces udev (<< 228-5)
> >
> >
Hi,
Paul Zeiger writes:
> I am currently setting up a web server and I want the network to be
> managed by systemd's networkd and name resolution to be performed by
> resolved. However the file
>
> /usr/lib/systemd/resolv.conf
>
> is missing and it should be provided by the package according to
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 07:56 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> After the upgrade to stretch, my kernel paniced on boot. I
> eventually tracked the problem down to /usr not yet being mounted,
> and /sbin/init needing liblz4.so which was in /usr.
The /usr filesystem must be mounted by the initramfs (if
47 matches
Mail list logo