a seccomp sandbox for its extractors nowadays.
> The error you get is most likely a result of that.
Thanks Michael. I just checked upstream and this issue is reported and fixed
already (Probably in version 1.12).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779342
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://p
Package: libpam-systemd
Version: 232-23
Followup-For: Bug #732209
I see the same problem show up on my GNOME box. In my case, it is
tracker that is complaining, which could be a reason why I haven't
directly witnessed any loss of functionality in my laptop usage.
May 18 11:44:52 learner
ue
AUTHENTICATING FOR org.freedesktop.policykit.exec ===
Authentication is needed to run `/bin/true' as the super user
Authenticating as: Ritesh Raj Sarraf,,, (rrs)
Password:
polkit-agent-helper-1: error response to PolicyKit daemon:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.Error.Failed: No session for cookie
prompt where exactly?
> On hostA, hostB?
The action (machinectl) is run on hostB over SSH.
> Does userC have a running X session on hostB besides the SSH session?
>
Yes. hostB also runs Debian Unstable + Xorg + GNOME.
> Still not getting the full picture here yet.
- --
Package: systemd
Version: 232-17
Severity: important
Hello,
***
rrs@chutzpah:~$ echo $DISPLAY
localhost:10.0
14:22 __ _
rrs@chutzpah:~$ export DISPLAY=""
14:22 __ _
rrs@chutzpah:~$ machinectl login debTemplate
networkd[923]:
> [/etc/systemd/network/tap.netdev:5] Unknown section 'TAP'. Ignoring.
>
> Would be great if you can file a bug report upstream. This doesn't look
> like a Debian specific issue.
Thanks. Bug filed and linked with this one.
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rr
ckaging?action=show=systemd%2FPackaging#Using_debhelper_with_dh_systemd
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pjpYo/LhdWkFAliI2UoACgkQpjpYo/Lh
dWnfGQ//Zbjrxxw642aqafkXk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 20:05 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I just purged iio-sensor-proxy, but:
> >
> > $ ps 574
> > PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
> > 574 ? Ssl 4:10 /usr/sbin/iio-sensor-proxy
&g
etty.
In my opinion, for now, euid != 0 with an exit is fine. But you want want to
exit 1, which would justify the actual error cause.
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pj
ystemd/systemd/issues/1559
I think this Debian bug could be marked as done.
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pjpYo/LhdWkFAlhU68wACgkQpjpYo/Lh
dWl4CBAApoO5WR+M0wN8XZ/11Mmo
Package: systemd-coredump
Version: 231-10
Severity: wishlist
I just started using systemd-coredump and was wondering if it has
capability to generate a full stack trace ?
A standard installation wouldn't really have all the debug symbol
packages installed. On Ubuntu (and also an outdated version
ssing Reload), and Restart's effect are
not desirable in all scenarios.
The bug is only happening in one of the case, i.e. only during resume.
THe same code works fine after resumption.
Any advise where I should look ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Op
Control: reassign -1 virutalbox
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:40 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:28 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I hope I have been able to explain the problem. Or in other words,
> > how
> > do I achieve a bridge interface stat
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:28 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I hope I have been able to explain the problem. Or in other words,
> how
> do I achieve a bridge interface status like the following under
> systemd-networkd ?
>
> 4: sysbr0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>
Thanks Martin.
For the issue in itself, it now looks like something specific to
systemd.
I'll see if I can take it up with upstream devs.
Thanks,
Ritesh
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:44 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf [2015-11-14 15:18 +0530]:
> > > > IPForward=yes
On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 15:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> That said, it still does not work. And the odd part is, networking is
> only broken for IPv4.
From within the container, this reporting from networkctl is
interesting.
It states:
root@deb-template:~# networkctl status
●
is not going to happen any time
soon.
I think upstream had a similar view about /var/lib/machines/, where in
they chose btrfs only. Which led to users with ext4, with almost no
functionality. Please see: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13
08 for details. It is confirmed as a feature requ
6 via 172.16.20.1
Nov 14 15:28:35 deb-template systemd-networkd[281]: host0: Configured
The "cannot configure IPv4." is now a warning message.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/495/files
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necess
On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 15:27 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> I am not sure how it determines the "routable" status. The default
> gateway is 172.16.20.1, which is not pingable.
The same setup, now bound to the traditional bridge, is working.
root@deb-template:~
next upload.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@l
age for core dump handlers and have
> each
> of them provide that and conflict with it.
>
> I propose core-dump-handler as the virtual package.
Should work for apport. Once the final name is finalized, I'll add the
the relation into the package.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://ww
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 03:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I've uploaded 0.20150901t074837.245fe93-1, would be great if you can
> retry with that version.
Thanks Michael. This version works perfect on my setup.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Ope
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 23:32 +0300, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> I get the same here, so it's not just your system being weird.
> journalctl also shows this for various other services, but a gnome
> -shell session starts up without problems... so it doesn't seem to
> affect everything.
I'm glad that
> and you can't rely on that in your multipath udeb.
Hmmm... I'll look into it later. But when you say "No systemd in d-i",
does it mean that is how it is going to remain ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Descr
use upstream added systemd dependency
some time ago. For Jessie, I had disabled systemd support, but now, it
makes sense to have it, and align with upstream and other
distributions.
So, I think the real question is about why libsystemd0 does not have a
udeb ?
systemd maintainers should provide
don't recollect if I tried that then), an
experienced systemd user should be able to dive into the logs.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
pe. Did not work for me. Based on your feedback, I tried on a 2nd
box, but still the same problem.
Gpaste Shell Extension, Iceweasel etc all complain.
Even evolution complains if I look into the journal logs.
I guess I'll just wait for some time :-)
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.o
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 00:53 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Do you have dbus-user-session installed?
> If not, please install it an re-test.
Hello Michael,
Installing dbus-user-session did not help. I still get the same error
messages.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Package: kdbus-dkms
Version: 0.20150824t110616.0c05fbd-1
Severity: normal
Thanks for packaging kdbus. I'm assuming that you are willing to take
bug reports. If not so, please let me know.
>From what I've read so far, my understanding was that kdbus was a
drop-in replacement over dbus.
When
ooted it proper. And provided with the getty login
on the shell.
> At least this works for me.
THanks. With this method, machinectl is able to login into the
container. It still cannot login, if the container was started through
machinectl.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debi
-
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian
m going to wait for the new release to land in Debian,
and then explore again.
PS: I booted the same with LXC, and have not run into the issues.
Sometimes, choice is really good. :-)
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Descr
Package: systemd-container
Version: 225-1
Followup-For: Bug #792882
Hello Michael / Martin,
I'm following up on this bug report with the new issue, after the new
systemd package, which includes the new systemd-container package.
So, the initial problem in this bug report was about dependency
Package: systemd-container
Version: 225-1
Severity: normal
File: /bin/machinectl
This one is an odd behavior. I export my container image, and the same
is not allowed to be imported.
rrs@chutzpah:/var/lib/lxc$ sudo machinectl export-tar fed-test
/var/tmp/fedora-container.tar.gz
Enqueued
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771675
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention
♒♒♒ ☺
So now, I'm going to add similar check conditions for the pm-utils hook
and the acpid hook.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg
On Monday 06 July 2015 04:33 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Sorry for the typo here, I meant /run/systemd/system here, without the
'd' suffix.
Oh! Thanks. That did not hit me. But another one did.
systemctl --non-block
:-)
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian
with older systemd, and was able to narrow
it down.
For now, I'm downgrading back to 220, and spend some more time observing
the anomalies.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on
emitting events, when the charge of the battery changes.
That is what was causing multiple events, thus leading to multiple
invocations of lmt.
I've fixed it in my code, and so have reassigned this bug back to lmt.
Thank you for your help.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian
-polling-daemon. This
script is backgrounded after we acquire a lock in the main program i.e.
/usr/sbin/laptop_mode, and not released until the polling daemon is killed.
How is systemd/cgroup supposed to handle scripts that background other
scripts ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention.
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd
for a reason,
when they want to consolidate everything at a central location.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers
with the iSCSI block devices mount/umount. It also takes
care of LVM devices, if any, created on top of it.
The iscsid daemon is not needed for the full operation of the iSCSI
service. Hence the daemon handling is separated from the iSCSI sessions
that are handled in-kernel.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http
On 01/21/2015 02:39 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Thanks Christian. I'm building a setup to verify the same.
I was able to reproduce the problem on my local setup. I've put up a
video just to be sure we are both referring to the same problem.
http://youtu.be/cwcnk00Hwk0
Next, I'll verify your
Package: systemd
Version: 215-5+b1
Severity: important
In my host, I have systemd-shim installed. systemd is not the init used
to boot, but rather is installed because of the dependencies. The
default init is openrc.
When booting LXC Containers, with systemd as the init (i.e. systemd-sysv
On Tuesday 02 September 2014 01:33 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit more, why those are needed?
What is upstream doing about this?
The block storage has many components that work closely with one another.
Take an example, root fs on LVM on Multipath on iSCSI.
The flow
on Debian bug:
760182
Per the bug report, there is no systemd support in d-i. Which then means
that I need to disable systemd support ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
___
Pkg-systemd
for it ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd
48 matches
Mail list logo
