Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler: Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks wrong anyway. As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems

Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this? Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least invasive change: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks wrong

Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.01.2015 um 16:02 schrieb Christian Seiler: Am 27.01.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler: Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks wrong anyway.

Re: Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 01/27/2015 08:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems with /usr on NFS. How likely is such a setup? I.e. using /usr-on-NFS + openisci in combination. Has anyone actually ever tested this? There is no real data to show. But one uses remote storage for a

Re: Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.01.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: On 01/27/2015 08:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems with /usr on NFS. How likely is such a setup? I.e. using /usr-on-NFS + openisci in combination. Has anyone actually ever tested this? There is no

Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 26.01.2015 um 08:43 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package open-iscsi open-iscsi currently using SysV init scripts for operation. The current init scripts, when run

Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Christian Seiler
(Since I didn't get cc'd in the original reply, I'm replying here. Sorry about that.) Am 26.01.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: On 01/26/2015 07:54 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: unblock open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4 That patch doesn't look right. Calling systemctl from an init script

Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 01/26/2015 07:54 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: unblock open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4 That patch doesn't look right. Calling systemctl from an init script is a big no-go. Second, shipping a generated unit file which does run /etc/init.d/foo is a hack at best. I'd be really unhappy,

Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 26.01.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Christian Seiler: Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this? Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least invasive change: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks wrong