[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] flatpak_0.6.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:24:48 +0100 Source: flatpak Binary: flatpak flatpak-builder flatpak-tests gir1.2-flatpak-1.0 libflatpak-dev libflatpak-doc libflatpak0 Architecture: source Version: 0.6.2-1 Distribution:

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Processing of flatpak_0.6.2-1_source.changes

flatpak_0.6.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flatpak_0.6.2-1.dsc flatpak_0.6.2.orig.tar.xz flatpak_0.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Пpивeтcтвую

___ Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

Great! Thank you! Joaquim Rocha | +49.151.661.20299 | Endless On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > > On Tue, 24 May 2016 at 15:02:04 +0200, Joaquim Rocha wrote: > > Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

BTW, Alex has released 0.6.2. Will you have packages soon? (so I hold on the Endless's ones for a little while) Joaquim Rocha | +49.151.661.20299 | Endless On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Joaquim Rocha wrote: > Great! Thank you! > > Joaquim Rocha | +49.151.661.20299

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

Control: tags -1 pending On Tue, 24 May 2016 at 15:02:04 +0200, Joaquim Rocha wrote: > Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses only the > dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev. ... and they conflict. All else being equal, we should probably build-depend

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #825191 [flatpak] Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak Added tag(s) pending. -- 825191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825191 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

Package: flatpak Version: 0.6.1 Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses only the dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev. This bug serves to clarify which of the libraries should be used. Is there an advantage of using one over the other? libdw on jessie