Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

2005-08-02 Thread Gregory Steuck
Marco == Marco S Hyman Marco writes: Marco $ mozilla-firefox (nothing happens. Ditto when I blow away Marco .mozilla, first) FWIW, mozilla-firefox-1.0.6 works for me on OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC#31 amd64. That's -release, I presume Marco is trying -current. Bye Greg

Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

2005-08-02 Thread Marco S Hyman
FWIW, mozilla-firefox-1.0.6 works for me on OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC#31 amd64. That's -release, I presume Marco is trying -current. Correct, I should have mentioned that. Current as of about 12 hours ago on a dual opteron system. On the off chance that I built something incorrectly I did a

Re: firefox crash x11

2005-08-02 Thread Pedro Marcolino
Hi, That's not entirely true , i've recompiled X with the new patch, and i still get X crashes from time to time. Also, Xlock and Xscreensaver are behaving strangely( sometime they kill the X and others i can't unlock the screen since i get a black screen... going into the console and pkill

Re: firefox crash x11

2005-08-02 Thread Andreas Kahari
On 01/08/05, Douglas Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: firefox 1.0.6 crash my x11. I dont know how to reproduce, browsing acm.org or ieee.org it crash. Two machines with this problem. Anyone have this same problem? I built my X11 on the 12th of June from i386 CURRENT, and sometimes (very

Re: nagios 2.0b3

2005-08-02 Thread Mitja Muženič
First, a disclaimer: my test is not by the book and I know that - feel free to yell at me. The production machine I'd like to run nagios on is still on 3.6-stable. What I did was not the nicest thing in the world but I created the _nagios user and group using the info from PLIST, ripped the two

UPDATE: multitail-3.6.0

2005-08-02 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Hi! I've attached an update to multitail-3.6.0. Works for me on i386, amd64 and sparc64. Please test and comment. Bernd Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/multitail/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-08-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, the static versions of the modules, like libp2edrvstd.a, are entirely useless, no point in packaging them. The same for the .la files corresponding to modules (unless ltdl is involved, but I don't see it). What's the preferred way:

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-08-02 Thread steven mestdagh
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:01:51PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, the static versions of the modules, like libp2edrvstd.a, are entirely useless, no point in packaging them. The same for the .la files corresponding to modules (unless

Re: NEW: books/svn-book

2005-08-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Mike Pechkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for fun: 1. I don't understand LICENCE of the book The summary makes it look like a two-clause BSD license. The actual text has a lot of verbiage... the most offensive thing I see is that you may not distribute the book under some copy-protected/DRM

Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

2005-08-02 Thread Marco S Hyman
Simon Dassow writes: On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:19:52PM -0700, Marco S Hyman wrote: $ mozilla-firefox (nothing happens. Ditto when I blow away .mozilla, first) I can't second that, firefox 1.0.6 runs on amd64 (-current from sunday), no problems or anything else. Does your

Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

2005-08-02 Thread Ulrich Kahl
Marco S Hyman schrieb: Simon Dassow writes: On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:19:52PM -0700, Marco S Hyman wrote: $ mozilla-firefox (nothing happens. Ditto when I blow away .mozilla, first) I can't second that, firefox 1.0.6 runs on amd64 (-current from sunday), no problems or

Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

2005-08-02 Thread Jolan Luff
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 09:09:05PM +0200, Ulrich Kahl wrote: Marco S Hyman schrieb: Simon Dassow writes: On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:19:52PM -0700, Marco S Hyman wrote: $ mozilla-firefox (nothing happens. Ditto when I blow away .mozilla, first) I can't second that, firefox

Re: firefox crash x11

2005-08-02 Thread Henning Brauer
* Pedro Marcolino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-02 11:43]: That's not entirely true , i've recompiled X with the new patch, and i still get X crashes from time to time. I haven't seen a single one since I started to run with that diff, which is about a week ago. It is unlear wether the crashes

My fault, was: Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

2005-08-02 Thread Ulrich Kahl
Jolan Luff schrieb: [...] i don't get why you jumped in on this thread, especially with this message. does firefox 1.0.6 work for you on an SMP amd64 machine running very recent -curent? Sorry, I had misunderstood the question, my fault. Read it too fast ... Ulrich

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-08-02 Thread steven mestdagh
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:40:57PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, this module seems to work. The annoying part is that it insists on ImageMagick opening two blank X11 windows. Ugh. Now I'm wondering if there are any advantages in

Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

2005-08-02 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 11:25:19AM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote: From: Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] FWIW, mozilla-firefox-1.0.6 works for me on OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC#31 amd64. That's -release, I presume Marco is trying -current. Correct, I should have mentioned that. Current as of about 12