Attn: Account Lock Out - Unlock your Account Access

2005-11-05 Thread Peoples Bank
[TABLE NOT SHOWN]

New ports tree feature

2005-11-05 Thread Nikolay Sturm
Hi, as you might have noticed I committed a new feature to the ports tree (idea from Marc Espie, done on the Portathon in Venice). Here is a quick explanation of what it does, so you can actually use it. :) The new feature is activated by setting FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in /etc/mk.conf or on the

windowmaker 0.92 64bits patch

2005-11-05 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Hi, this is a minimal patch to fix the most visible issues on 64 bits architectures (problems caused by the weird XGetProperty() API). There are more similar problems in the code, but my previous attempt (for Windowmaker 0.91) to fix them all at once by more or less brute force introduced

Re: windowmaker 0.92 64bits patch

2005-11-05 Thread Matthieu Herrb
I wrote: Hi, this is a minimal patch to fix the most visible issues on 64 bits architectures (problems caused by the weird XGetProperty() API). Here's an updated patch, which also fixes WMPrefs startup. -- Matthieu ? log Index:

Re: UPDATE: security/clamav

2005-11-05 Thread J Moore
Will this show up as a patch to the 3.7 -stable ports tree anytime soon, or is it safe just to apply the patch to the 3.7 ports tree? Thnx, Jay On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:02:20PM +0200, the unit calling itself nikns wrote: clamav 0.87.1 - security update:

Reactivate Your Citibank Account!

2005-11-05 Thread Citigroup
[TABLE NOT SHOWN]

Re: Mozilla Firefox 1.5rc1

2005-11-05 Thread Steve Shockley
Kurt Miller wrote: Tested on sparc64 with remote X ok. Themes working ok, but I haven't found an extension that is 1.5rc1 compatible. Anyone know of one? I haven't done any testing on OpenBSD yet, but I've used Adblock Plus and other extensions on FF 1.6a1, you just have to look for their

Re: UPDATE: security/clamav

2005-11-05 Thread Marc Balmer
J Moore wrote: Will this show up as a patch to the 3.7 -stable ports tree anytime soon, or is it safe just to apply the patch to the 3.7 ports tree? It's not security related. It's just a new version, afaik. And the SF download sites seem not all have the file. -mb

Re: UPDATE: security/clamav

2005-11-05 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* J Moore [2005-11-05]: Will this show up as a patch to the 3.7 -stable ports tree anytime soon, or is it safe just to apply the patch to the 3.7 ports tree? This will be applied to 3.7-stable and 3.8-stable as soon as it gets committed to -current. Nikolay

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:45:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So if you wanna include such a new sheme and if many people think it's usefull then do it but do it wisely. usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date was rewritten in Perl and is still buggy. So if you wanna change something

Re: UPDATE: education/drgeo

2005-11-05 Thread Alexandre Anriot
--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:15:09PM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote: hi, this updates drgeo to 1.1.0. now this software works on i386 (0.9.3 did not work properly). some slight port

Re: UPDATE: education/drgeo

2005-11-05 Thread steven mestdagh
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:56:13AM +0100, Alexandre Anriot wrote: The update looks correct. It builds and runs on i386 here, but the soft has some issues, e.g when trying to create a segment, it crashes with something like: (1st and 2nd point) First instantiation of item with key

Re: New: games/pioneers

2005-11-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 04:54:27PM +0100, Jonathan Glaschke wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:38:53AM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:12:56AM +0100, Jonathan Glaschke wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:34:52AM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at

RFC: Switch Python to 2.4 by default

2005-11-05 Thread Marc Balmer
We intend to switch the default Python version from 2.3 to 2.4 anytime soon. This means that all ports using Python will use version 2.4 instead of 2.3, which was the default until now. Python 2.3 will remain in the tree. We are currently running bulk builds with Python 2.4 enabled to see if

Re: UPDATE: security/clamav

2005-11-05 Thread J Moore
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 11:59:20PM +0100, the unit calling itself Nikolay Sturm wrote: Will this show up as a patch to the 3.7 -stable ports tree anytime soon, or is it safe just to apply the patch to the 3.7 ports tree? This will be applied to 3.7-stable and 3.8-stable as soon as it gets

build jdk on 3.8

2005-11-05 Thread Julien TOUCHE
i'm trying to build java on openbsd 3.8/x86 which seems a long long road thanks to sun. i downloadeed all needed src, install redhat emulation, jdk-linux (jdk-linux-1.3.1_15 is no more available, it's jdk-linux-1.3.1_16 now, symlink is ok) and i'm trying to compile 1.5 which need 1.4. with