Updated to 1.4 version, tested on i386.
Giovanni
base64-1.4.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
I have updated this port to 20060312 version, tested on i386.
Giovanni Bechis
http_load-20060312.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
Giovanni Bechis [2006-12-20, 08:49:37]:
Port updated to version 0.8.5.4a, tested on i386.
Giovanni Bechis
your patch to use strlcpy is wrong.
I have removed the strlcpy patch
Giovanni
P.S.: do you think you should add strlcpy and strnprintf patches while
updating a port or is better not
Judging from the amount of noise this post made
I'm guessing that either a) no one cared or b) I
didn't supply enough relevant info for anyone to
bother to chime in with a hint or a pointer.
I don't know much about systrace to be able to
make any realistic progress with this, but some
hints would
I've found that current port, when building -userdb subpackage
configures with arg --with-makedatprog with no value, after that
$makedat becomes yes and not
${LOCALBASE}/libexec/courier-authlib/makedatprog. Setting CONFIGURE_ARGS
+=
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, patrick ~ wrote:
Judging from the amount of noise this post made
I'm guessing that either a) no one cared or b) I
didn't supply enough relevant info for anyone to
bother to chime in with a hint or a pointer.
I don't know much about systrace to be able to
make any
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 08:14:22PM -0600, Will Maier wrote:
This patch updates devel/mercurial to version 0.9.3, released
today. This release fixes a number of bugs introduced with the
short-lived 0.9.2. Changes included in 0.9.3 can be found on the
Mercurial website:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kurt Miller wrote:
I've attached an updated diff that should work with
thunderbird 1.5.0.9 that was just committed.
Awesome, you did it!
Thanks a lot,
Stephan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (OpenBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG
Hi Otto,
It is very late here, but thanks for your hint
about NAME_MAX.
I've been looking at the systrace sources trying
to figure out how it works and if there would be
any obvious path len issues that would pop-out.
I couldn't find any.
I took your suggestion to try and find a simple(er)
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 08:14:22PM -0600, Will Maier wrote:
Could someone look at this? The diff is still available at the URL
above.
tested on i386, it works great
Giovanni Bechis
Hi folks!
I'm running 4.0-current, and i would like to update my binary
packages i tried to run
pkg_add -u and i got a PKG_PATH not found (dig up google and found
out that you need to point it to the latest packages available
SNAPSHOTS) I was successfull at updating some, but when it
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:02:19 +0100, Martynas Venckus wrote:
Hi,
Please test the diff below.
Bugs fixed for Firefox 2.0.0.1: ~183 in total; 42 crashers, 3 memory
leaks, 41 regressions and 4 privacy-related bugs.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Beavis wrote:
- pkg_add -u package-name
but even if there's an option of doing pkg_add -F
update package-name it doesn't work for stuff like libs, gtk+2,etc.
$ export PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.example.com/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/arch
$ sudo pkg_add -ui -F
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, patrick ~ wrote:
Hi Otto,
It is very late here, but thanks for your hint
about NAME_MAX.
I've been looking at the systrace sources trying
to figure out how it works and if there would be
any obvious path len issues that would pop-out.
I couldn't find any.
I
Frank Denis wrote:
$ du -sh packages
5.2Gpackages
So, that would mean that a bulk build would need ~10G in /usr/ports?
That's useful to know.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 09:02:17AM -0600, Beavis wrote:
I'm running 4.0-current, and i would like to update my binary
packages i tried to run
First, if you're running -current, it's assumed that you know what
you're doing and can deal with breakages on your own. If you don't
know what you're
Will,
nothing is broken and the reason why i am at current is because I
can deal with the breakage. the only concern i have here is an
effective procedure on how to do upgrades nothing is broken on my
packages and even if i upgraded some of them they still work pretty
well.
-Ed
On
thanks for the tip antoine I will definitely try that.
-Ed
On 12/22/06, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Beavis wrote:
- pkg_add -u package-name
but even if there's an option of doing pkg_add -F
update package-name it doesn't work for stuff like
Le Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Steve Shockley ecrivait :
Frank Denis wrote:
$ du -sh packages
5.2Gpackages
So, that would mean that a bulk build would need ~10G in /usr/ports?
That's useful to know.
Yes :)
update to the following:
net/p5-Net-Wake
textproc/p5-Object-MultiType
textproc/p5-XML-Smart
since the resulting binary package doesn't change, i didn't bump the
package (according to my quick review of cpan.port.mk).
Index: Makefile
Giovanni Bechis [2006-12-22, 10:32:03]:
Updated to 1.4 version, tested on i386.
nice, but nothing changed to the code ...
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Antoine,
the upgrade worked :) thanks again!
-Ed
openbsd...simply rules!
On 12/22/06, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Beavis wrote:
- pkg_add -u package-name
but even if there's an option of doing pkg_add -F
update package-name it doesn't
Giovanni Bechis [2006-12-22, 10:32:03]:
Updated to 1.4 version, tested on i386.
nice, but nothing changed to the code ...
Only some fixes on configure...
Giovanni Bechis
Hi all,
Compiling www/mozilla from -current yields the following syntax errors
in gfx/src/ps/nsType1.cpp
nsType1.cpp:371: error: invalid conversion from `int (*)(FT_Vector*,
void*)' to
`int (*)(const FT_Vector*, void*)'
nsType1.cpp:371: error: invalid conversion from `int
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
Frank Denis wrote:
$ du -sh packages
5.2Gpackages
So, that would mean that a bulk build would need ~10G in /usr/ports?
That's useful to know.
That would not include the additional space also necessary when building
the
25 matches
Mail list logo
