CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2008-07-31 Thread Martynas Venckus
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/07/31 11:31:00 Modified files: devel/nspr : Makefile Log message: nspr 4.7.1 ships source tarball with weird permission modes. fix modes for header files in the install target, so that the

devel/nspr requires root to build

2008-07-31 Thread Andreas Kahari
Hi list, I noticed that the devel/nspr port (CURRENT) requires root to build. It won't build with SUDO=sudo. Also, it installs header files readable only by root and the wheel group, which means that ports depending on it also needs to build as root (SUDO=sudo won't work). Regards, Andreas --

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Rother
Theo wrote: Yes, and sometimes tough love is required. Perhaps whoever the maintainer is will merge this in time. Perhaps not. Let me pose a question: Would you rather have a good release that has good quality integration between packages or One that has the latest python? Let

Re: kqemu unstable on current

2008-07-31 Thread Gallon Sylvestre
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Sebastian Rother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I face complete system freezes during using kqemu+qemu. If I use qemu with -no-kqemu I have no problems at all. OpenBSD (current) freezes completly on a ThinkPad X61s without providing any coredumps during

Re: devel/nspr requires root to build

2008-07-31 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Andreas Kahari wrote: Hi list, I noticed that the devel/nspr port (CURRENT) requires root to build. It won't build with SUDO=sudo. Also, it installs header files readable only by root and the wheel group, which means that ports depending on it also needs to build as

Re: kqemu unstable on current

2008-07-31 Thread Michael
Hi, Gallon Sylvestre schrieb: I've got the same problem with a macbook and the current GENERIC.MP. Already had that issue with the 4.3 MP kernel. AFAIK it is not something new. At least I never managed to get qemu run stable with kqemu loaded when also using a MP kernel. Only works reliable

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Marc Espie
Look, I'm going to side with Theo on that one. There are lots of *big* issues to fix each release. It doesn't look like it from outside, but we have show-stoppers. Each release, we refine the process. This release, we cut down on the number of non-critical commits right up to the lock. So that

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:28:27PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote: Theo wrote: Yes, and sometimes tough love is required. Perhaps whoever the maintainer is will merge this in time. Perhaps not. Let me pose a question: Would you rather have a good release that has good quality

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Theo de Raadt
Theo wrote: Yes, and sometimes tough love is required. Perhaps whoever the maintainer is will merge this in time. Perhaps not. Let me pose a question: Would you rather have a good release that has good quality integration between packages or One that has the latest

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Rother
Look, I'm going to side with Theo on that one. There are lots of *big* issues to fix each release. It doesn't look like it from outside, but we have show-stoppers. Each release, we refine the process. This release, we cut down on the number of non-critical commits right up to the lock.

Re: kqemu unstable on current

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Rother
Hi, Gallon Sylvestre schrieb: I've got the same problem with a macbook and the current GENERIC.MP. Already had that issue with the 4.3 MP kernel. AFAIK it is not something new. At least I never managed to get qemu run stable with kqemu loaded when also using a MP kernel. Only works

Re: devel/nspr requires root to build

2008-07-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008/07/31 10:59, Andreas Kahari wrote: Hi list, I noticed that the devel/nspr port (CURRENT) requires root to build. It won't build with SUDO=sudo. Also, it installs header files readable only by root and the wheel group, which means that ports depending on it also needs to build as

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:32:02PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote: Look, I'm going to side with Theo on that one. There are lots of *big* issues to fix each release. It doesn't look like it from outside, but we have show-stoppers. Each release, we refine the process. This release,

Re: devel/nspr requires root to build

2008-07-31 Thread Andreas Kahari
2008/7/31 Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2008/07/31 10:59, Andreas Kahari wrote: Hi list, I noticed that the devel/nspr port (CURRENT) requires root to build. It won't build with SUDO=sudo. Also, it installs header files readable only by root and the wheel group, which means that

Re: net/tinyfugue update 4.0s1p2 - 5.0b8

2008-07-31 Thread Markus Lude
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:29:58PM +0200, Markus Lude wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:11:44PM -0401, jared r r spiegel wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:02:59PM -0400, Brad wrote: On Wednesday 16 July 2008 19:50:05 jared r r spiegel wrote: the pkg/PLIST in here has a .orig file it

Agustos Ilk Hafta Egitimleri

2008-07-31 Thread Egitim ilan
BOGAZICI AGUSTOS ILK HAFTA GENEL KATILIMA ACIK EGITIM SEMINERLERÄ° ISLETMELER ICIN FAIZ, KUR TAHMININDE MERKEZ BANKASI BILANCO ANALIZI CONSULTATIVE SELLING TO C-LEVEL EXECUTIVE Egitmen: Sevket SAYILGAN, 2-3 Agustos 2008 / 725 YTL+KDV Amac : Piyasalarin (faiz, kur, enflasyon, sermaye

Re: devel/nspr requires root to build

2008-07-31 Thread Markus Lude
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:59:20AM +0100, Andreas Kahari wrote: Hi list, I noticed that the devel/nspr port (CURRENT) requires root to build. It won't build with SUDO=sudo. Also, it installs header files readable only by root and the wheel group, which means that ports depending on it also

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Jona Joachim
On 2008-07-31, Sebastian Rother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Theo wrote: Yes, and sometimes tough love is required. Perhaps whoever the maintainer is will merge this in time. Perhaps not. Let me pose a question: Would you rather have a good release that has good quality integration

Re: kqemu unstable on current

2008-07-31 Thread spanky
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Sebastian Rother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] So please no flamewar, it's realy just a idea I thought wich may would be worth of writing down so that people may find it when they google for openbsd qemu freeze. :) And now they will find Sebastian Rother