On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 6:15 AM Markus Lude wrote:
> I don't understand what your goal is.
My goal was to make a tf5 port, but since I use a shell script
(involving xterm and nc) more often than I use tf5 these days (though
I still use tf5, especially on lower-end machines) I think I'll just
let
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 05:42:08PM -0400, Andras Farkas wrote:
Hi Andras,
I don't understand what your goal is.
A few years ago you wrote me you would like to make a port of tinyfuge
5. I suggested to make a new port tinyfugue5 and maybe name the binary
tf5 instead of tf.
I'm MAINTAINER of
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 4:07 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Re the first submission you pointed out, here is the comment:
> - programmable MUD client, but beta rather than stable
> This doesn't sound like something we want in ports.
TinyFugue is a weird thing. Both tf4 and tf5 (which should be
I've filed a bug report for a problem with amdgpu firmware on -current.
All the versions I've used that had that new firmware.
Simple workaround for the moment if you get it.
Causes boot to crash. I have to poweroff by hand.
I saw that others could ssh into and shutdown.
boot -c
disable amdgpu
Re the first submission you pointed out, here is the comment:
- programmable MUD client, but beta rather than stable
This doesn't sound like something we want in ports.
(Also in general, new ports are always trickier because there's a policy of
always needing a second developer ok to commit
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:34 PM Chris Bennett
wrote:
> Port something.
Last time I ported something I got no reply and gave up.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=148150979321732=2
> Update something.
Similar story there:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=156583823801955=2
Please go read:
https://www.openbsd.org/papers/vbsdcon2019-care-and-feeding.pdf
"There are 10715 packages for amd64 in snapshots"
"There aren't even 100 OpenBSD porters"
So that means that for every porter, there are more than 100 ports
sitting out there.
Thats. Not. OK.
Thats. Not. The.
