On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:46:44AM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
Frank Denis wrote:
$ du -sh packages
5.2Gpackages
So, that would mean that a bulk build would need ~10G in /usr/ports?
That's useful to know.
That would not
Frank Denis wrote:
$ du -sh packages
5.2Gpackages
So, that would mean that a bulk build would need ~10G in /usr/ports?
That's useful to know.
Le Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Steve Shockley ecrivait :
Frank Denis wrote:
$ du -sh packages
5.2Gpackages
So, that would mean that a bulk build would need ~10G in /usr/ports?
That's useful to know.
Yes :)
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
Frank Denis wrote:
$ du -sh packages
5.2Gpackages
So, that would mean that a bulk build would need ~10G in /usr/ports?
That's useful to know.
That would not include the additional space also necessary when building
the
Hi,
Can someone send me `du -sch' from distfiles/ and tell me aprox. how
much I will need space for full build of ports? I see that all packages
for i386 have less than 4.5GB
--
best regards
q#
Le Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:04:33PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski ecrivait :
Can someone send me `du -sch' from distfiles/ and tell me aprox. how
much I will need space for full build of ports? I see that all packages
for i386 have less than 4.5GB
Sure:
$ du -sch /usr/ports/distfiles
4.9G
Le Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:04:33PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski ecrivait :
Can someone send me `du -sch' from distfiles/ and tell me aprox. how
much I will need space for full build of ports? I see that all packages
for i386 have less than 4.5GB
And if you are talking about packages, after a full
