I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
non responsive to private emails about this.
Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
released (you were notified of this also Rui) and all version earlier
than 1.2.15 suffer a remote code
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:47:56AM -0400, Peter Thoenen wrote:
I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and
very non responsive to private emails about this.
A fix (up to 0.1.2.16) was committed to -current yesterday; it was
MFCed this morning.
On 8/8/07, Peter Thoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
non responsive to private emails about this.
Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
released (you were notified of this also Rui) and all
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:47:56AM -0400, Peter Thoenen wrote:
I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
non responsive to private emails about this.
Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
released (you were notified of this also Rui) and
I agree with you on this -current/-stable thingy. This ports tree
soft locking shit *how we care about -stable users* is bullshit,
when outdated/security vulnerable stuff is even in -current and
it takes ages to backport and make packages of needed security updates...
I see there no logic,
* Peter Thoenen [2007-08-08]:
Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
Tor 1.2 only came out around the release of 4.1 and no update was marked
a security update, so there was no reason to update the -stable ports.
We have our policies and we do have them for a good
I am sorry do get my hands dirty with a thread like that but I just can't
help my self.
The only thing I thought of when reading peters post was:
Why the hell didn't he send a patch to the maintainer?
-Julian
--
Lubarsky's Law of Cybernetic Entomology:
There's always one more bug.
Julian Frede wrote:
I am sorry do get my hands dirty with a thread like that but I just can't
help my self.
The only thing I thought of when reading peters post was:
Why the hell didn't he send a patch to the maintainer?
because he's busy sucking on a bag of dicks.
-Julian
--
