Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2020-07-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/07/26 08:29, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Sat Jul 25, 2020 at 01:55:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2020/07/25 09:16, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > +WANTLIB += ${COMPILER_LIBCXX} boost_python${MODPY_VERSION:C/\.//g}-mt m > > > > Oh yeuch. Seems like a candidate for a

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2020-07-26 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sat Jul 25, 2020 at 01:55:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/07/25 09:16, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > +WANTLIB += ${COMPILER_LIBCXX} boost_python${MODPY_VERSION:C/\.//g}-mt m > > Oh yeuch. Seems like a candidate for a boost.port.mk with a > ${MODBOOST_PYLIB} or something? > The

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2020-07-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/07/25 09:16, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > +WANTLIB += ${COMPILER_LIBCXX} boost_python${MODPY_VERSION:C/\.//g}-mt m Oh yeuch. Seems like a candidate for a boost.port.mk with a ${MODBOOST_PYLIB} or something?

UPDATE: devel/boost

2020-07-25 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Please find below a git diff to update boost from 1.66.0 to 1.67.0 (Not to the latest). The diff also includes patches to unbreak all consumers. The most annoying and biggest part contains the renamed boost_python,boost_python3 to boost_numpy27,boost_python38. Since this is off the table, the next

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-30 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All! > > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the > current boost. > > Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html > > I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted. afaik

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-29 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All! > > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the > current boost. > > Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html > > I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted.

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-28 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Sun, Jan 28 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote: [...] > Thank you both! FreeBSD applied the same patch. ok jca@ > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/kea/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.12 >

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-28 Thread David Coppa
Il 28 gen 2018 16:32, "Landry Breuil" ha scritto: On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:29:35AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Hi All! > > > > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the > >

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-28 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:29:35AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Hi All! > > > > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the > > current boost. > > > > Changelog:

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-28 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All! > > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the > current boost. > > Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html > > I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted. Seen

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-28 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sat Jan 27, 2018 at 04:07:59PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > Il 27 gen 2018 3:56 PM, "Jeremie Courreges-Anglas" ha > scritto: > > On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Hi All! > > Hey, > > > This time easier than last time and a relative easy

Re: [David Coppa] Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-27 Thread David Coppa
I only tested a few deps on sparc64 so far. devel/dlib and games/bastet* succeed, but net/kea** seems to suffer: It's also upstream: https://github.com/isc-projects/kea/commit/17ed090beb6cefa78e29a95c645eb6da4edf8028

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-27 Thread David Coppa
Il 27 gen 2018 3:56 PM, "Jeremie Courreges-Anglas" ha scritto: On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All! Hey, > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the > current boost. > > Changelog:

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-27 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All! Hey, > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the > current boost. > > Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html > > I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted.

UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-26 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi All! This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the current boost. Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted. Best regards, Rafael Sadowski Index: Makefile

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-21 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: Hi All!

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-21 Thread Landry Breuil
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:59:19AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > >> Hi All! > > >>

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-21 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >>> Hi All! >>> >>> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-20 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Thu, December 21, 2017 02:59, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >>> Hi All! >>> >>> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please >>> find

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-20 Thread Landry Breuil
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:59:19AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > >> Hi All! > >> > >> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail.

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-20 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >> Hi All! >> >> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find >> attached a diff as tarball to update boost to the latest stable

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-18 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Please find attached a second traball without botan to apply cleanly without trapping in an error. On Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All! > > After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find > attached a diff as tarball to update

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-15 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 09:04:36AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Hi All! > > > > After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find > > attached a diff as tarball to update boost to the latest stable

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2017-12-15 Thread Landry Breuil
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All! > > After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find > attached a diff as tarball to update boost to the latest stable version > 1.65.1. > > Notable port changes. > > - Of course bump all

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2010-03-22 Thread Auclair Vincent
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Federico G. Schwindt fg...@lodoss.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:46:03PM +0100, Auclair Vincent wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Auclair Vincent auclair.vinc...@gmail.com wrote: Compiled ok :) regress didn't work # make regress ===

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2010-03-21 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:46:03PM +0100, Auclair Vincent wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Auclair Vincent auclair.vinc...@gmail.com wrote: Compiled ok :) regress didn't work # make regress === ?Regression check for boost-1.41.0p0 make: cannot open Makefile. *** Error code

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2010-01-12 Thread Auclair Vincent
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Auclair Vincent auclair.vinc...@gmail.com wrote: Compiled ok :) regress didn't work # make regress ===  Regression check for boost-1.41.0p0 make: cannot open Makefile. *** Error code 2 Stop in /yellowstone/workbox/git/ports/devel/boost (line 2226 of

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2010-01-11 Thread Andrej Elizarov
Compiled ok. Tested on i386-current. Thank you.

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2010-01-03 Thread Markus Hennecke
Markus Hennecke wrote: Federico G. Schwindt wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:24:28AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009/12/13 08:23, Andrej Elizarov wrote: if you're still interested mind to update it to the latest version and send it again? i have made step in past. Stuart Henderson

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2010-01-03 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
Hi, Just an update: To unbreak graphics/hugin when using boost-1.41 someone would have to backport this fix from gcc 3.4: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17327 Nice finding. I have done a patch for gcc, but I think it is not complete as gcc-3.3.5 is missing the parser.c file.

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2009-12-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/12/13 08:23, Andrej Elizarov wrote: if you're still interested mind to update it to the latest version and send it again? i have made step in past. Stuart Henderson wrote about boost 1.39: unfortunately this update breaks graphics/hugin, editors/openoffice3 and net/powerdns; build

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2009-12-13 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:24:28AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009/12/13 08:23, Andrej Elizarov wrote: if you're still interested mind to update it to the latest version and send it again? i have made step in past. Stuart Henderson wrote about boost 1.39: unfortunately this

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2009-12-12 Thread Andrej Elizarov
if you're still interested mind to update it to the latest version and send it again? i have made step in past. Stuart Henderson wrote about boost 1.39: unfortunately this update breaks graphics/hugin, editors/openoffice3 and net/powerdns; build logs attached donno 'bout hugin. i made patch for

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2009-05-16 Thread Marco Peereboom
threads work too. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:11:21AM +0400, Andrej Elizarov wrote: updated from 1.34.1 to 1.39.0. if there is some bugs, please let me now. thanks all for participation.

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost

2009-05-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/05/15 10:11, Andrej Elizarov wrote: updated from 1.34.1 to 1.39.0. if there is some bugs, please let me now. thanks all for participation. thanks for working on this! your diff misses a few parts; you need to 'cvs add' any newly added files, 'cvs rm' any files that you removed,

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost 1.34.1

2008-01-24 Thread Mikko Tolmunen
The rest sounds good, however, the update breaks monotone. It seems that the boost_regex lib is unusable for us in 1.34.1: in devel/monotone: checking boost version 1.32.0 or newer... yes checking for the boost_filesystem library... yes checking for the boost_regex library... no

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost 1.34.1

2008-01-23 Thread Deanna Phillips
Mikko Tolmunen writes: On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:52:15 Deanna Phillips wrote: Neat. Could you please explain the reason for and origin of the patches to boost code? BJAM_CONFIG environment variable can be used in CONFIGURE_ENV, as i added SO_VERSION variable to the boost jamfile that

Re: UPDATE: devel/boost 1.34.1

2008-01-10 Thread Deanna Phillips
Neat. Could you please explain the reason for and origin of the patches to boost code?