Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6.1 (was: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6)

2010-08-22 Thread Aleksander Piotrowski
Markus Lude markus.l...@gmx.de wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:45:48PM +0200, viq wrote: And looks like it's time to deal with it, as I can't fetch the distfile right now... I guess the reason is the 2.8.6.1 release, though it's highly annoying that older release sources are not

UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6.1 (was: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6)

2010-08-02 Thread Markus Lude
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:45:48PM +0200, viq wrote: And looks like it's time to deal with it, as I can't fetch the distfile right now... I guess the reason is the 2.8.6.1 release, though it's highly annoying that older release sources are not available anymore... I contacted upstream about

Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-07-28 Thread viq
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:11:14PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010/07/12 18:00, Markus Lude wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:13:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010/07/02 10:49, Markus Lude wrote: generally looks ok, one thing I noticed though: can't the workarounds

Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-07-12 Thread Markus Lude
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:13:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010/07/02 10:49, Markus Lude wrote: generally looks ok, one thing I noticed though: can't the workarounds for the timeval conflict just be removed now that they have changed to timeval32? They only changed those

Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-07-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/07/12 18:00, Markus Lude wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:13:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010/07/02 10:49, Markus Lude wrote: generally looks ok, one thing I noticed though: can't the workarounds for the timeval conflict just be removed now that they have changed

Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-07-02 Thread Markus Lude
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:30:48AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010/06/08 12:57, Markus Lude wrote: On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:38:21AM +0200, Markus Lude wrote: Hello, attached is an update to the recently released version 2.8.6 of snort. Finally I got rid of the version numbers

Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-07-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/07/02 10:49, Markus Lude wrote: generally looks ok, one thing I noticed though: can't the workarounds for the timeval conflict just be removed now that they have changed to timeval32? They only changed those places to sf_timeval32 which have to do with unified output. The

Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-07-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/06/08 12:57, Markus Lude wrote: On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:38:21AM +0200, Markus Lude wrote: Hello, attached is an update to the recently released version 2.8.6 of snort. Finally I got rid of the version numbers for the shared libs. IPv6 is enabled. Builds of all flavors look good

Re: UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-06-08 Thread Markus Lude
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:38:21AM +0200, Markus Lude wrote: Hello, attached is an update to the recently released version 2.8.6 of snort. Finally I got rid of the version numbers for the shared libs. IPv6 is enabled. Builds of all flavors look good on i386 and sparc64. As I mainly use the

UPDATE: net/snort-2.8.6

2010-05-05 Thread Markus Lude
Hello, attached is an update to the recently released version 2.8.6 of snort. Finally I got rid of the version numbers for the shared libs. IPv6 is enabled. Builds of all flavors look good on i386 and sparc64. As I mainly use the unflavored version tests especially of the different flavors are