On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:12:57 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> The new versions add a new bridge authority.
> https://github.com/torproject/tor/blob/master/ReleaseNotes
>
> Both pass the tests. OK?
OK for the stable version.
>
> Current:
&g
The new versions add a new bridge authority.
https://github.com/torproject/tor/blob/master/ReleaseNotes
Both pass the tests. OK?
Current:
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile(revision 130631)
+++ Makefile(working copy)
@@
key violations and similar issues.
More informations here:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1511/
I tested -current, 5.5 -stable and 5.4-stable on @amd64.
Could someone do a test on a 5.3-stable ?
Comments, OK ?
ping ??
No 5.3, but it's been working well
://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1511/
I tested -current, 5.5 -stable and 5.4-stable on @amd64.
Could someone do a test on a 5.3-stable ?
Comments, OK ?
ping ??
No 5.3, but it's been working well for me on 5.4 i386.
Daniel
--
LÉVAI Dániel
PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F
Key fingerprint = DBEC
. This can then cause query results to be inconsistent
depending on whether or not an index is used, and eventually lead to
primary key violations and similar issues.
More informations here:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1511/
I tested -current, 5.5 -stable and 5.4-stable on @amd64
or not an index is used, and eventually lead to
primary key violations and similar issues.
More informations here:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1511/
I tested -current, 5.5 -stable and 5.4-stable on @amd64.
Could someone do a test on a 5.3-stable ?
Comments, OK ?
Regards,
--
Pierre-Emmanuel
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:19:40PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:55:06PM +0300, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
oh, my first thought was that ppl is some arch, like ppc =)
$ uname -rpmsv
OpenBSD 4.6 GENERIC#6 i386 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz
(GenuineIntel
anymore since 1.1.15.2 and after which builds fine with -current,
otherwise i suppose i would have get some complains since then...
Providing an error message, a compiler version, etc... could be useful.
(if we cared about ppl building current ports on stable)
You can also comment on https
and after which builds fine with -current,
otherwise i suppose i would have get some complains since then...
Providing an error message, a compiler version, etc... could be useful.
(if we cared about ppl building current ports on stable)
You can also comment on https://bugs.webkit.org
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:55:06PM +0300, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
oh, my first thought was that ppl is some arch, like ppc =)
$ uname -rpmsv
OpenBSD 4.6 GENERIC#6 i386 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz
(GenuineIntel 686-class)
snip
$ pkg_info|grep g++|awk '{print $1}'
g++-4.2.4p5
That was
ok. now to errors.
i get some similiar to yours
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26099
but now with 4(four) asserts and different line numbers.
i'll be more accurate when reproduce it.
webkit-1.1.15.4/ $grep -r COMPILE_ASSERT . | wc -l
137
hey, this is exactly the same error
. Given the monster webkit is, i already lost way too
many hours in it maintaining/testing it for -current, i won't spend time
on frankeinstein -stable/-current mixes.
You can still push the issue further in webkit bz.
Landry
with i386/-current, and we'll see if
it's a real bug. Given the monster webkit is, i already lost way too
many hours in it maintaining/testing it for -current, i won't spend time
on frankeinstein -stable/-current mixes.
no problem, i was so verbose because you was interested in,
i can deal my monster
-o JavaScriptCore/jit/libJavaS criptCore_la-JITStubs.lo `test
-f 'JavaSc
riptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp' || echo './'
`JavaScriptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp
JavaScriptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp:84: error: array bound is not an
integer constan
t
JavaScriptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp:85: error: array
while compiling webkit-1.1.15.4v0 from current ports on 4.6-stable i still
need
patch-JavaScriptCore_jit_JITStubs_cpp .
here it is. it just works for me.
--- JavaScriptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp.origMon Jan 4 06:03:57 2010
+++ JavaScriptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp Mon Jan 4 06:17:10 2010
@@
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:52:02PM -0700, Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrote:
I am working on learning how to port, c. and am trying to figure out which
flavor of OpenBSD that I need to run. Does it need to be current if I want
to help with porting?
As many have already said, run -current for
I am working on learning how to port, c. and am trying to figure out
which flavor of OpenBSD that I need to run. Does it need to be current if
I want to help with porting?
Sorry if this is somewhere in the documentation. I did not see it clearly
in any place that I have read so far.
-Dan
Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrote:
I am working on learning how to port, c. and am trying to figure out
which flavor of OpenBSD that I need to run. Does it need to be current
if I want to help with porting?
If you want a port to be committed, it needs to compile against -current.
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:52:02PM -0700, Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrote:
I am working on learning how to port, c. and am trying to figure out which
flavor of OpenBSD that I need to run. Does it need to be current if I want
to help with porting?
You should run -current for working on ports.
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:52:02PM -0700, Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrote:
I am working on learning how to port, c. and am trying to figure
out which flavor of OpenBSD that I need to run. Does it need to
be current if I want to help with porting?
Changes to the ports tree occur in -current, so
20 matches
Mail list logo
