--- Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been considered before and we came to the
conclusion to simply stick to the -stable release.
There is no reason to have every single development
version of software inside the ports tree...
unless there is a very good reason, but in
This has been considered before and we came to the conclusion
to simply stick to the -stable release. There is no reason
to have every single development version of software inside
the ports tree... unless there is a very good reason, but in
the case of fvwm2, I don't really see it. A
Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Anyway, they should just label it as stable, cause it is, this would
solve the situation.
Sometimes a so-called development version is a lot more stable than the
one dubbed stable. In that case nothin speaks against updating the
port. I did this e.g. with
Bernd said:
Antoine Jacoutot [Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:37:29PM +0200] wrote:
Selon Mike Belopuhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below comes update to fvwm2 port to bring it up to 2.5.18.
I did not try the diff but at first glance:
- there's no need for a png flavor, it should be included by default
-
Hello for the third time today ;)
Below comes update to fvwm2 port to bring it up to 2.5.18.
New features according to fvwm.org:
* Full Enhanced Window Manager Hints support
* Full internationalization
* Greatly improved font support, including anti-aliasing
* Improved
Selon Mike Belopuhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below comes update to fvwm2 port to bring it up to 2.5.18.
I did not try the diff but at first glance:
- there's no need for a png flavor, it should be included by default
- why did you remove Peter Valchev from maintainer? Did you contact him?
Anyway,
Hi Antoine,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 14:37 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Selon Mike Belopuhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below comes update to fvwm2 port to bring it up to 2.5.18.
I did not try the diff but at first glance:
- there's no need for a png flavor, it should be included by default
Ok.
Antoine Jacoutot [Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:37:29PM +0200] wrote:
Selon Mike Belopuhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below comes update to fvwm2 port to bring it up to 2.5.18.
I did not try the diff but at first glance:
- there's no need for a png flavor, it should be included by default
- why did you remove
Selon Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How about creating stable and snapshot dirs inside the x11/fvwm2
directory instead of add a fvwm2-devel port dir?
Oh, definitely the right thing to do IMHO.
Also, the -fvicons subpackage should work for both versions (stable and
snapshot)
--
Antoine
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 15:26 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Selon Bernd Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How about creating stable and snapshot dirs inside the x11/fvwm2
directory instead of add a fvwm2-devel port dir?
Oh, definitely the right thing to do IMHO.
Also, the -fvicons subpackage
10 matches
Mail list logo
