On 07/15/15 21:22, Stuart Henderson wrote:
[...]
Is that this
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_is_Network_Neighbourhood_empty_or_does_not_show_all_machines_in_an_Samba_AD_environment.3F
(i.e. functionality not implemented in the AD DC yet)?
Can you just run samba4 as an NT4-type
: OpenBSD ports; Ian McWilliam
Subject: Re: samba4 switch - affected ports
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
On 2015/07/15 12:45, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Giovanni Bechis giova...@paclan.it writes:
[...]
From my latest tests there is no network browsing with a Samba4 AD server
On 07/15/15 19:25, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
So yesterday I looked at the ports that make use of samba. Turns out
switching to samba4 should be easy. The only issues I'd hate to see
would be weak architecture support (__sync_fetch_and_blah...).
Anyway, this is a post-5.8 change.
On 2015/07/15 11:25, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
So yesterday I looked at the ports that make use of samba. Turns out
switching to samba4 should be easy. The only issues I'd hate to see
would be weak architecture support (__sync_fetch_and_blah...).
I'll try it on i386/powerpc. Can
Giovanni Bechis giova...@paclan.it writes:
On 07/15/15 19:25, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
So yesterday I looked at the ports that make use of samba. Turns out
switching to samba4 should be easy. The only issues I'd hate to see
would be weak architecture support
On 2015/07/15 12:45, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Giovanni Bechis giova...@paclan.it writes:
On 07/15/15 19:25, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
So yesterday I looked at the ports that make use of samba. Turns out
switching to samba4 should be easy. The only issues I'd hate to see
2015-07-15 20:25 GMT+03:00 Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas j...@wxcvbn.org:
So yesterday I looked at the ports that make use of samba. Turns out
switching to samba4 should be easy. The only issues I'd hate to see
would be weak architecture support (__sync_fetch_and_blah...).
Anyway, this is a
So yesterday I looked at the ports that make use of samba. Turns out
switching to samba4 should be easy. The only issues I'd hate to see
would be weak architecture support (__sync_fetch_and_blah...).
Anyway, this is a post-5.8 change.
I'd appreciate testing from people running the affected
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
On 2015/07/15 12:45, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Giovanni Bechis giova...@paclan.it writes:
[...]
From my latest tests there is no network browsing with a Samba4 AD server
(at least till 4.1.18, I haven't tested 4.2.x) and a samba3 nmbd
