Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-06 Thread David Coppa
Here's the answer from damien@ I think it's still too early to commit this port. bye, david -- Forwarded message -- From: damien.bergam...@free.fr Date: Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:17 AM Subject: Re: [Testing aircrack-ng (Was Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng)] To: David Coppa dco

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-06 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:24:13AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: Here's the answer from damien@ I think it's still too early to commit this port. [...] Well, i could import but not yet connect it to security/Makefile. It may help to get more people testing possible driver patches. Any opiniions?

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-06 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:25:08PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:24:13AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: Here's the answer from damien@ I think it's still too early to commit this port. [...] Well, i could import but not yet connect it to security/Makefile. It may

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-06 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote: Well, i could import but not yet connect it to security/Makefile. It may help to get more people testing possible driver patches. sounds like a plan. Any opiniions? Ciao,        Kili ps: port for

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-06 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Federico G. Schwindt a écrit : On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:25:08PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:24:13AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: Here's the answer from damien@ I think it's still too early to commit this port. [...] Well, i could import but not yet connect it to

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-05 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:55:45AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@stsp.name wrote: Various aircrack-ng ports have been sitting on the mailing lists for months. If it works for you (i.e. if you can get it to crack a WEP, which for various

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-05 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 07:55:23PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: aireplay-ng --test interface causes a kernel panic. I'm waiting for an answer by Damien Bergamini... The critical function is do_attack_test() that starts at line 4868 of aireplay-ng.c sorry if i'm jumping in late,

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-05-05 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Matthias Kilian a écrit : On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 07:55:23PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: aireplay-ng --test interface causes a kernel panic. I'm waiting for an answer by Damien Bergamini... The critical function is do_attack_test() that starts at line 4868 of aireplay-ng.c sorry if

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-04-16 Thread David Coppa
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@stsp.name wrote: Various aircrack-ng ports have been sitting on the mailing lists for months. If it works for you (i.e. if you can get it to crack a WEP, which for various reasons I never could), commit it. aireplay-ng --test interface

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-04-15 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:56:49PM +0100, Benoit Lecocq wrote: On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:02:24PM +0100, Benoit Lecocq wrote: A update port of aircrack-ng 1.0-rc2 done by Stefan Sperling. OK with Stefan. You dropped some patches from stsp@ (and i don't refer to the manpage bits which

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-04-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:56:49PM +0100, Benoit Lecocq wrote: On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:02:24PM +0100, Benoit Lecocq wrote: A update port of aircrack-ng 1.0-rc2 done by Stefan Sperling. OK with Stefan. You dropped

Testing aircrack-ng (Was Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng)

2009-04-14 Thread David Coppa
During easter vacations, I was doing some tests with the aircrack-ng port posted on this list (well, a port of the latest 1.0-rc3 trivially updated by me). I've noticed that performing a deauth attack using aireplay-ng was causing a kernel panic in net80211/ieee80211_input.c at line 145: /*

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-03-13 Thread Dawe
Benoit Lecocq wrote: Matthias Kilian wrote: Hi, On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:02:24PM +0100, Benoit Lecocq wrote: A update port of aircrack-ng 1.0-rc2 done by Stefan Sperling. OK with Stefan. You dropped some patches from stsp@ (and i don't refer to the manpage bits which have been fixed

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-03-09 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:02:24PM +0100, Benoit Lecocq wrote: A update port of aircrack-ng 1.0-rc2 done by Stefan Sperling. OK with Stefan. You dropped some patches from stsp@ (and i don't refer to the manpage bits which have been fixed upstream). For example, something like

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-03-09 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Matthias Kilian wrote: Hi, On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:02:24PM +0100, Benoit Lecocq wrote: A update port of aircrack-ng 1.0-rc2 done by Stefan Sperling. OK with Stefan. You dropped some patches from stsp@ (and i don't refer to the manpage bits which have been fixed upstream). For example,

NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2009-03-07 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Hi, A update port of aircrack-ng 1.0-rc2 done by Stefan Sperling. OK with Stefan. Tested on i386/amd64 with run0 device. Comments ? OK ? Commit ? Cheers, Benoit Lecocq port_aircrack-ng-1.0-rc2.tar.gz Description: application/gzip

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2006-11-22 Thread Jason Crawford
Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder why it was never put in. Jason On 11/22/06, Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/11/21, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Here is the port for

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2006-11-22 Thread Anton Karpov
2006/11/22, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder why it was never put in. No idea. Nobody here provided any feedback, and there was no reaction from ports

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2006-11-22 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Selon Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No idea. Nobody here provided any feedback, and there was no reaction from ports committers. No reaction at all. Well, for testing this one needs a WiFi supported adapter, which I don't. Maybe I did something wrong, and there is another way to submit a

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2006-11-22 Thread Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0300, Anton Karpov wrote: 2006/11/22, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder why it was never put in. No idea. Nobody

Re: NEW: security/aircrack-ng

2006-11-22 Thread mark
We don't always have the time to look over everything that gets posted on the mailing list. Just be persistent, eventually someone will get to your submission. -- Mathieu Sauve-Frankel What's happening with the tcpstat port? I tried to get in touch with the maintainer but no reply. No