Hi all,
Hope you're all doing well in this unusual context.
I'm working on a postfix that routes outgoing mail only.
It's been a while I try to configure postfix to restrict a specific client
(by its IP@) to send from a specific sender only. I browsed forums, but
never found exactly what I'm
Jason Bailey:
> I've got notification emails from a legacy system passing through a
> Postfix install I'm using to relay messages to the proper outbound
> server. Things are working great except occasionally messages are sent
> from the legacy system with a null sender address (e.g. "MAIL
> FROM:
I've got notification emails from a legacy system passing through a
Postfix install I'm using to relay messages to the proper outbound
server. Things are working great except occasionally messages are sent
from the legacy system with a null sender address (e.g. "MAIL
FROM: <>").
Is there a way
Keith:
> I'm coming back into Postfix after not really needing to dig into it much
> the last few years and trying to
> catch up to some of the changes. Last version I really used heavily was 2.x
> something.
>
> Using version 3.2.2 under FreeBSD 11.
>
> I see a lot of these in the logs:
>
>
On 30 Apr 2020, at 10:52, Keith wrote:
> Using version 3.2.2 under FreeBSD 11.
The current version of 3.2 is 3.2.12, so update at least to that.
> There are a lot of this in the log as bots etc try to AUTH on port 25. Is
> there a way to turn this off or at least not have it scattered in the
On 2020-04-30 17:52 BST, Keith wrote:
> I'm coming back into Postfix after not really needing to dig into it
> much the last few years and trying to catch up to some of the
> changes. Last version I really used heavily was 2.x something.
Postscreen arrived since then so you should probably use
I'm coming back into Postfix after not really needing to dig into it much
the last few years and trying to
catch up to some of the changes. Last version I really used heavily was 2.x
something.
Using version 3.2.2 under FreeBSD 11.
I see a lot of these in the logs:
Apr 30 01:51:42 mail1
Kurt Roeckx:
> Hi,
>
> The log file shows:
> postfix/submission/smtpd[28578]: warning: Illegal address syntax from
> unknown[192.168.1.144] in RCPT command:
Indeed, unquoted whitespace is not valid in this context.
> Since it's a user of my domain, I would expect to get an error. Is
> there a
Dnia 30.04.2020 o godz. 11:59:18 Ralph Seichter pisze:
>
> Are you certain that "he...@gmail.com" and "h.e...@gmail.com" are the
> same user as far as Google is concerned? In any case, this is not a
> Postfix issue.
Not sure what do you mean by "the same user", but at least it's certain that
* Walter Peng:
> Many users use gmail's variants to sign up the site, as we know,
> foo...@gmail.com is equivalent to below similar:
>
> foo...@googlemail.com
> foob...@googlemail.com
> [...]
Are you certain that "he...@gmail.com" and "h.e...@gmail.com" are the
same user as far as Google is
Hi,
The log file shows:
postfix/submission/smtpd[28578]: warning: Illegal address syntax from
unknown[192.168.1.144] in RCPT command:
Where domain is in mydestination. There where other people in
To/Cc, but that user didn't get the email, nor did the sender get
any indication that that user
I see the value of the ability to recognise such Gmail address variants, and
would use it myself to prevent people trivially working around Gmail addresses
being on a blacklist email receipt or for service signup.
Sam.
On 30/04/2020 09:27, Walter Peng wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> We are
Thanks Viktor for these suggestions. I will reconsider my implementation.
Regards.
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Apr 30, 2020, at 3:27 AM, Walter Peng wrote:
Is there a library existing to validate all those variants to make sure
they are exactly the same account?
Why do you feel you need to
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 3:27 AM, Walter Peng wrote:
>
> Is there a library existing to validate all those variants to make sure
> they are exactly the same account?
Why do you feel you need to do this? What if a user opens multiple Gmail
accounts? Or uses multiple accounts at more than one of
Not sure why you need a library for this. Strip out all dots, split at +
and use the first value for comparison. That's trivial in every language.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello community,
We are running a small website which allow users registration with their
email.
Many users use gmail's variants to sign up the site, as we know,
foo...@gmail.com is equivalent to below similar:
foo...@googlemail.com
foob...@googlemail.com
foo@gmail.com
foobar+...@gmail.com
16 matches
Mail list logo
