On 14.03.21 20:14, Juri Haberland wrote:
> On 14.03.21 12:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Juri Haberland wrote:
>>> You should get this information from the AR-header. It should look like
>>> this:
>>> Authentication-Results: mx.example.org; dmarc=pass
On 14.03.21 12:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Juri Haberland wrote:
>> You should get this information from the AR-header. It should look like
>> this:
>> Authentication-Results: mx.example.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine
>> dis=none) header.from=example.com;
>>
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Juri Haberland wrote:
> You should get this information from the AR-header. It should look like
> this:
> Authentication-Results: mx.example.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine
> dis=none) header.from=example.com;
> See the "p=quarantine dis=none" in the
On 11/03/2021 10:22, Nick Tait wrote:
> On 11/03/21 11:37 am, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>> This fix has been merged to the opendmarc “Develop” branch as of a few
>> minutes ago and will likely be in a 1.4.1 that comes out in the next few
>> weeks, and will default to *not* quaranting the mail. The
