On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:26:30AM +0800, frakass wrote:
> I have a virtual_mailbox_domain: a.com
> and I have a virtual_alias_domain: b.com
>
> I can setup this entry in virtual_alias_maps for a domain alias:
>
> x...@b.com x...@a.com
>
> but what's the usage of virtual_mailbox_maps?
I have a virtual_mailbox_domain:
a.com
and I have a virtual_alias_domain:
b.com
I can setup this entry in virtual_alias_maps for a domain alias:
x...@b.com x...@a.com
but what's the usage of virtual_mailbox_maps?
Thank you.
Frank Brendel:
> I can't reproduce it anymore.
> I moved two files which failed before into incoming and they are now
> sent.
>
> Could it be that it was because of the large deferred queue?
By design, Postfix does not know how many messages there are in the
mail queue. The queue manager knows
I can't reproduce it anymore.
I moved two files which failed before into incoming and they are now
sent.
Could it be that it was because of the large deferred queue?
Filesystem or parallel processing somehow?
The queue is now small because the remote full mailbox was fixed and
all messages were
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 02:25:20PM +, Frank Brendel wrote:
>
> > So I can try to reproduce it by simply putting that file into the
> > incoming queue?
>
> Within the same filesystem, yes.
>
> > Our test system has FreeBSD 13.1 and Postfix 3.7.2 installed. I'd try
> > to
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 02:25:20PM +, Frank Brendel wrote:
> So I can try to reproduce it by simply putting that file into the
> incoming queue?
Within the same filesystem, yes.
> Our test system has FreeBSD 13.1 and Postfix 3.7.2 installed. I'd try
> to resend a mail via that system.
If
So I can try to reproduce it by simply putting that file into the incoming
queue?
Our test system has FreeBSD 13.1 and Postfix 3.7.2 installed.
I'd try to resend a mail via that system.
Thank you
Frank
Frank Brendel
Administrator Rechenzentrum
Telefon: +49 811 9595-157
Telefax: +49 811
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:27:19AM +, Frank Brendel wrote:
> > Are you using MailScanner or other non-Postfix software that
> > reads or updates Postfix queue files?
> >
> > Wietse
>
> No, only Postfix and Dovecot with replication. I've attached the
> postconf output.
>
> But
Any way I could get removed from this list?
Thanks!
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:59 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Frank Brendel:
> > > Here's the Postfix log and the queue file.
> > >
> > > Aug 30 13:02:23 elvmwlx94.eurolog.com postfix/smtpd[56532] 57850C4DC9:
> > >
Wietse Venema:
> Frank Brendel:
> > Here's the Postfix log and the queue file.
> >
> > Aug 30 13:02:23 elvmwlx94.eurolog.com postfix/smtpd[56532] 57850C4DC9:
> > client=unknown[194.50.162.68]
> > Aug 30 13:02:23 elvmwlx94.eurolog.com postfix/cleanup[55311]
> > 57850C4DC9: message-id=<>
> > Aug 30
Hi Wietse,
no, only Postfix and Dovecot with replication.
I've attached the postconf output.
But regarding 'queue files' I have about 265.000 deferred
mails (recipients mailbox full).
Filesystem is UFS2.
Thank you
Frank
Frank Brendel
Administrator Rechenzentrum
Telefon: +49 811 9595-157
Frank Brendel:
> Hi,
>
> sporadically I get the error
> Unexpected record type 'X' at offset ...
> and the message is moved to the corrupt queue.
>
> E.g.
> postfix/smtpd[19574] 010EDD6443: client=unknown[1.2.3.4]
> postfix/cleanup[98995] 010EDD6443: message-id=<>
> postfix/qmgr[63719]
Hi,
sporadically I get the error
Unexpected record type 'X' at offset ...
and the message is moved to the corrupt queue.
E.g.
postfix/smtpd[19574] 010EDD6443: client=unknown[1.2.3.4]
postfix/cleanup[98995] 010EDD6443: message-id=<>
postfix/qmgr[63719] 010EDD6443: from=,
size=14197, nrcpt=24
13 matches
Mail list logo