[pfx] Re: No Permissions To TLS Certificates

(Sorry, can't remember if I should be top-posting or bottom-posting :-)  ) The answer for both queries: * The root folder is 555 root:root * All other folders are 755 root:root * The certs themselves are 600 root:root (I think I mentioned this one in my original post - I think) Having

[pfx] user based transport

Hello, How can I setup username based transport? for incoming messages, such as use...@foo.com will be delivered to host a. use...@foo.com will be delivered to host b. Thanks. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe

[pfx] Re: Transport according to MX record

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 02:02:55AM +0200, Daniel Ryšlink via Postfix-users wrote: > It's generally very useful to set up a specific transport for "sensitive" > domains like gmail.com with specific policy (throttling outgoing message > rate, etc). > > However, since more and more hosted domains

[pfx] Transport according to MX record

Hello, It's generally very useful to set up a specific transport for "sensitive" domains like gmail.com with specific policy (throttling outgoing message rate, etc). However, since more and more hosted domains use mail services for their domains, it would be useful to be able to select

[pfx] Re: forward IP source from a postfix relay to a postfix server

testeur via Postfix-users: > Hi, > > Well. > i read it : > https://postfix.traduc.org/index.php/XFORWARD_README.html > But i don't know how to implement that in postfix (master.cf ?) ?! the > link explain the "protocol"... > there's no howto to do it... > > if someone know an howto somewhere ?

[pfx] Re: forward IP source from a postfix relay to a postfix server

Hi, Well. i read it : https://postfix.traduc.org/index.php/XFORWARD_README.html But i don't know how to implement that in postfix (master.cf ?) ?! the link explain the "protocol"... there's no howto to do it... if someone know an howto somewhere ? Regards, PG On 11/10/2023 00:20, Wietse

[pfx] Re: Question about postscreen_dnsbl_sites

Ivan Ionut: > Thx, but I noticed that there is only for cidr...and i want for > hosts/domains too. If you want client name/domain based policies, don't use postscreen, use smtpd_mumble_restrictions instead. An smtpd process can do complex things such as verifying fully-confirmed

[pfx] Re: Backup outgoing mail from one user

Le 11/10/2023 à 20:15, Jack Raats via Postfix-users a écrit : One of my users (my wife)  lost her sent mail folder on her pc. She asked me if I had a backup of all het sent mail on my mail server, which I donn't. I have a backup of all her ingoing mail using procmail, but how can I make a

[pfx] Backup outgoing mail from one user

One of my users (my wife)  lost her sent mail folder on her pc. She asked me if I had a backup of all het sent mail on my mail server, which I donn't. I have a backup of all her ingoing mail using procmail, but how can I make a backup of all her outgoing mail? Thanks Jack

[pfx] Re: No Permissions To TLS Certificates

duluxoz via Postfix-users: > Oct 11 17:33:05 mail.me.local email_postfix[2038]: find: > '/etc/postfix/./certs/me.local.pem': Permission denied > Oct 11 17:33:05 mail.me.local email_postfix[2039]: postfix/postlog: > warning: not owned by root: /etc/postfix/./certs/me.local.pem What is the output

[pfx] No Permissions To TLS Certificates

Hi All, Hoping someone can point me in the correct direction to solve this one (ie why is postfix "not playing well" with our TLS Certs)  This is all internal (ie NOT on the Internet), so the below logs, etc, have NOT been "edited" or obscured. We're running two (internal) email domains:

[pfx] Re: Question about postscreen_dnsbl_sites

Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users: > > Hi, I'm using postscreen_dnsbl_sites to block some spam and I want some > domain/hosts/ip to bypass this option, like an whitelist. > > Does postscreen/postfix has this option? > Yes. Near the top of https://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#quick Quick

[pfx] Question about postscreen_dnsbl_sites

Hi, I'm using postscreen_dnsbl_sites to block some spam and I want some domain/hosts/ip to bypass this option, like an whitelist. Does postscreen/postfix has this option? p.s. my postfix version: 3.6.4 -- Ivan Ionuț Str. Mircea cel Bătrân nr 1, Galati 800023 Tel/Fax: +40236 493277

[pfx] Re: *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)" for many domains

On 11.10.23 15:06, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users wrote: Since this morning, various MX hosts in *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting are reporting back temporary errors for us: Exhibit A) host ohri-ca.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.75.228] said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients

[pfx] Re: *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)" for many domains

Dnia 11.10.2023 o godz. 15:11:27 Josef Vybíhal via Postfix-users pisze: > Hi, no clue about MS service, but it does not seem postfix related. > You might want to direct this to the mailop list - > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop It can be possibly related to some failure at Microsoft,

[pfx] Re: *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)" for many domains

Hi Interesting read and an answer https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/1388575/e-mail-sending-to-offcie-microsoft365-customers-no Paul On 11/10/2023 14:06, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users wrote: Hi! Since this morning, various MX hosts in *.mail.protection.outlook.com

[pfx] Re: *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)" for many domains

11.10.23, 15:06 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users: > Since this morning, various MX hosts in *.mail.protection.outlook.com > reporting are reporting back temporary errors for us: > > Exhibit A) > > host ohri-ca.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.75.228] said: 452 4.5.3 Too > many

[pfx] Re: *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)" for many domains

Hi, no clue about MS service, but it does not seem postfix related. You might want to direct this to the mailop list - https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop Josef On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:06 PM Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > Hi! > > Since this

[pfx] *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)" for many domains

Hi! Since this morning, various MX hosts in *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting are reporting back temporary errors for us: Exhibit A) host ohri-ca.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.75.228] said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)