On Wednesday, November 27, 2019 2:03:40 PM EST Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * Matus UHLAR:
> > Once again, SPF does not apply to mail headers.
>
> Matus, I feel your frustration.
>
> I mentioned RFC 7208 before in this thread. If only people would read
> section 2.2
* Matus UHLAR:
> Once again, SPF does not apply to mail headers.
Matus, I feel your frustration.
I mentioned RFC 7208 before in this thread. If only people would read
section 2.2 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#section-2.2) ff., to
understand how SPF authorization works and where in the
Den 26-11-2019 kl. 17:59 skrev Marek Kozlowski:
OK. I do not insist on postsrsd. I'd really appreciate any
suggestion: what can I use instaed of it - what do you recommend?
On 11/26/19 2:07 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
no one uses spf anymore
incorrect.
since it breaks mailling lists very
Hello
on 2019/11/27 12:20, Richard Damon wrote:
DMARC/SPF, which only validates to the From: header will break.
If the sender domain set up SPF to:
v=spf1 ip4:0.0.0.0/0 ~all
Will this pass through any SPF check?
regards.
On 11/26/19 2:07 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Den 26-11-2019 kl. 17:59 skrev Marek Kozlowski:
>
>> OK. I do not insist on postsrsd. I'd really appreciate any
>> suggestion: what can I use instaed of it - what do you recommend?
>
> no one uses spf anymore since it breaks mailling lists very badly ?,
:-)
sender_canonical_maps = unionmap:{ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-canonical.cf,
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-canonical2.cf, tcp:127.0.0.1:10001}
By design, unionmap can produce multiple results separated by comma.
That would be wrong. >
Why not:
sender_canonical_maps =
Marek Kozlowski:
> :-)
>
> >> Some users forward their incoming mail to some external mail servers.
> >> Unfortunately AFAIK with no action taken it may result in breaking the
> >> SPF. The solution for this problem I know is rewriting addresses with
> >> SRS (postsrsd). Unfortunately postsrsd
:-)
Some users forward their incoming mail to some external mail servers.
Unfortunately AFAIK with no action taken it may result in breaking the
SPF. The solution for this problem I know is rewriting addresses with
SRS (postsrsd). Unfortunately postsrsd uses the same settings as
canonicals do
Marek Kozlowski:
> :-)
>
> Some users forward their incoming mail to some external mail servers.
> Unfortunately AFAIK with no action taken it may result in breaking the
> SPF. The solution for this problem I know is rewriting addresses with
> SRS (postsrsd). Unfortunately postsrsd uses the
Den 26-11-2019 kl. 17:59 skrev Marek Kozlowski:
OK. I do not insist on postsrsd. I'd really appreciate any suggestion:
what can I use instaed of it - what do you recommend?
no one uses spf anymore since it breaks mailling lists very badly ?,
postfix maillist have not even spf helo pass :)
:-)
Some users forward their incoming mail to some external mail servers.
Unfortunately AFAIK with no action taken it may result in breaking the
SPF. The solution for this problem I know is rewriting addresses with
SRS (postsrsd). Unfortunately postsrsd uses the same settings as
canonicals
11 matches
Mail list logo
