On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:09:42AM +0300, OzyMate wrote:
> If I change smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt with
> smtplmtp_tls_security_level =encrypt, all seem working.
You completely ignored the bulk of my reply, and just fudged
something random. :-(
0. An apparently working configuration
ix/sasl_passwd
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
If I use the above lines in main.cf, mails are not delivered with the
following error in logs:
TLS is required, but was not offered by host 127.0.0.1
Why are you routing mail via SMTP over the loopback
working with my postfix
setup.
There is no error message other than "TLS is required, but was not
offered by host 127.0.0.1"
Thank you.
On 06.02.21 14:23, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 12:05:44PM +0100, OzyMate wrote:
TLS is required, but was not offered by host 127.0.0
MQWplBqjlIapBtJUhlbl90TSrE9atvNziPTnNvT51cKEY
WQPJIrSPnNVeKtelttQKbfi3QBFGmh95DmK/D5fs4C8fF5Q=
-END CERTIFICATE-
> If I use the above lines in main.cf, mails are not delivered with the
> following error in logs:
>
> TLS is required, but was not offered by host 127.0.0.1
Probably be
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
If I use the above lines in main.cf, mails are not delivered with the
following error in logs:
TLS is required, but was not offered by host 127.0.0.1
Why are you routing
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 12:05:44PM +0100, OzyMate wrote:
> TLS is required, but was not offered by host 127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1 is not Amazon SES. So you are not showing stuff or running
into the wrong direction. Please follow the instructions laid down in
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.h
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
If I use the above lines in main.cf, mails are not delivered with the
following error in logs:
TLS is required, but was not offered by host 127.0.0.1
If I comment "smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt&quo
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> ehlo test
> 250-mx0.esb.de
> 250-8BITMIME
> 250-SIZE 52428800
> 250 STARTTLS
> But the minus "-" is missing in STARTTLS correct?
No: it's the last line, hence no "-".
> Is there a known workaround available?
Looks like it should work... seems you
