Re: powertop shouldn't recommend ondemand when using inappropriate cpufreq drivers

2010-12-14 Thread Török Edwin
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:51:40 -0500 (EST) Jaroslav Skarvada jskar...@redhat.com wrote: PowerTOP should not recommend ondemand when p4-clockmod is used. AFAIK the p4-clockmod is autoloaded for thermal purposes, but the latency is too high for ondemand. There is RH bugzilla on it:

Re: powertop shouldn't recommend ondemand when using inappropriate cpufreq drivers

2010-12-14 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig says that p4-clockmod shouldn't be used at all, SpeedStep should be used instead, which would be the acpi-cpufreq driver, right? So maybe powertop should suggest using that (if CPU supports it) instead of p4-clockmod? Maybe, if the suggestion would be written

Re: powertop shouldn't recommend ondemand when using inappropriate cpufreq drivers

2010-11-05 Thread Auke Kok
On 11/04/10 08:22, Orion Poplawski wrote: Could someone comment on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497167 - powertop shouldn't recommend ondemand when using inappropriate cpufreq drivers On my P4 system, powertop 1.13 recommends: Suggestion: Enable the ondemand cpu speed governor

Re: powertop shouldn't recommend ondemand when using inappropriate cpufreq drivers

2010-11-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 11/5/2010 3:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/05/2010 12:59 PM, Auke Kok wrote: On 11/04/10 08:22, Orion Poplawski wrote: Could someone comment on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497167 - powertop shouldn't recommend ondemand when using inappropriate cpufreq drivers