[cabfpub] 答复: Ballot 202 and Unicode

2017-07-31 Thread xiongyuanyuan via Public
Hi All, SHECA accepts Peter’s suggested solution below. Thanks. Best Regards, Ruby Xiong Shanghai Electronic Certification Authority co., ltd. 18F, No.1717, North Sichuan Road, Shanghai, China Tel：+86-21-36393197 Email： xiongyuany...@sheca.com

[cabfpub] Ballot 202 and Unicode

2017-07-31 Thread Kirk Hall via Public
Thanks for your email, Yongqiang. It looks like GDCA can accept Peter Bowen’s suggested solution to this issue – can you please confirm that? Can the representatives of CFCA and SHECA also review Peter’s suggested solution below, and let other Forum members know if you can also accept the

Re: [cabfpub] [Ext] Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters

2017-07-31 Thread Paul Hoffman via Public
On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:57 AM, Peter Bowen wrote: > > >> On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Paul Hoffman via Public >> wrote: >> >> To (apologetically) throw a spanner into the works here: RFC 7719 is being >> revised, and this very definition is changing to be

Re: [cabfpub] [Ext] Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters

2017-07-31 Thread Paul Hoffman via Public
On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Rich Smith via Public wrote: > > Hi Peter, > Overall, I like your suggestions, but could I ask that in definitions where > you refer to outside RFC definitions that you include those outside > definitions verbatim so that someone reading the

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters

2017-07-31 Thread Rich Smith via Public
Hi Peter, Overall, I like your suggestions, but could I ask that in definitions where you refer to outside RFC definitions that you include those outside definitions verbatim so that someone reading the BRs does not have to go scouring through all the various RFCs? For example: Change:

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

2017-07-31 Thread Ben Wilson via Public
The rationale is that it is already current practice by many CAs to limit their total liability for CA operations. Also, not that this will save anybody from going out of business in the event of a serious breach, and I suspect that such CA would simply file for bankruptcy protection, but it

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

2017-07-31 Thread Gervase Markham via Public
On 25/07/17 21:59, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > Here is another pre-ballot for discussion. Can you explain the rationale for this ballot? Gerv ___ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters

2017-07-31 Thread Gervase Markham via Public
On 21/07/17 20:44, Doug Beattie via Public wrote: > I’m sorry I didn’t spend more time on this during the review period, but > I think it’s a mistake to define Domain Name to include wildcard > values. I understand the issues with saying “Domain Name and Wildcard > FQDN ” everywhere in the spec,

Re: [cabfpub] Random value reuse

2017-07-31 Thread Gervase Markham via Public
On 28/07/17 14:53, Jeremy Rowley via Public wrote: > I think the random value should be tied to a single communication > without reuse. For example, a single email sent to the constructed > emails, a single API call, a single phone call, etc. The random value > shouldn’t be tied to a method, but