Re: [cabfpub] FW: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6844 (5065)

2017-08-25 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews via Public
This looks good to me. On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Phillip wrote: > ​ > > I will endorse for Comodo but I don’t think we are quite there yet :) > > > Some further wordsmithing: > > > As part of the issuance process, the CA MUST check for a CAA record for > each dNSName

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 210 (NetSec Revisions)

2017-08-25 Thread Doug Beattie via Public
GlobalSign votes yes From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 11:47 AM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 210 (NetSec Revisions) Entrust votes

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 210 (NetSec Revisions)

2017-08-25 Thread Ben Wilson via Public
DigiCert votes "yes" From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 9:47 AM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 210 (NetSec Revisions) Entrust

Re: [cabfpub] FW: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6844 (5065)

2017-08-25 Thread Phillip via Public
​ I will endorse for Comodo but I don’t think we are quite there yet :) Some further wordsmithing: > As part of the issuance process, the CA MUST check for a CAA record for each > dNSName in the subjectAltName extension of the certificate to be issued, > according to the procedure in RFC