On 24/1/2019 8:16 μ.μ., Wayne Thayer via Public wrote:
On today's call we discussed a number of changes to the bylaws aimed
at clarifying the rules for membership. The proposal for section
2.1(a)(1) resulting from today's discussion is:
Certificate Issuer: The member organization
I've published a step-by-step guide to creating redlines for ballots on
GitHub. You can find it on the wiki under 'Ballots'.
If you try this and get stuck, I'm happy to help.
Thanks to everyone who helped by reviewing the doc.
Wayne
___
Public mailing
Here is a draft SMIME WG Charter. Please provide your comments.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vEswtzzMm0_G0ujoAT5ChiajyqfRfDTydG9Nmsc-eo4/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks,
Ben Wilson
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
Wayne – as I said on the call, I think the restriction should be narrower.
Something like “In order to avoid coming within the scope of the IPR Agreement
, the Forum and its Subcommittees shall not engage in the development or
amendment of Guidelines.”
The draft language you have below is
In the past, what we used to check for “actively” issuing certs were some
examples of recently issued certs from their roots that have public trust. This
was in addition to the audit reqt.
From: Public On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer via Public
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 1:16 PM
To:
On today's call we discussed a number of changes to the bylaws aimed at
clarifying the rules for membership. The proposal for section 2.1(a)(1)
resulting from today's discussion is:
Certificate Issuer: The member organization operates a certification
> authority that has a publicly-available
On today's call, we discussed the addition of the following section to the
Bylaws:
5.6Subcommittees
> The Forum may establish subcommittees of the Forum by ballot to address
> any of the Forum’s business as specified in the ballot. Subcommittees are
> open to all Forum Members. A Forum
