FWIW, I think we need to be careful about discussing IPR policy implications
without references to the relevant part of the IPR policy, which governs here.
The policy, as I understand it, only obligates WG participants to IPR
obligations. The implications of various approaches vary widely (and
Here are the final minutes of the subject call:
Attendees: Ali Gholami (Telia), Andrea Holland (SecureTrust), Ben Wilson
(Mozilla), Bruce Morton (Entrust), Chris Kemmerer (SSL.com), Chris McMillan
(Visa), Clint Wilson (Apple), Corey Bonnell (Digicert), Dean Coclin
(Digicert), Doug Beattie
On 11/11/2021 5:56 μ.μ., Tim Hollebeek wrote:
I don’t think it can be done. Remember, the entire point of various
people not being in various working groups is because they don’t want
to review, disclose, or grant licenses based on updates to the
documents in that working group.
While
I don’t think it can be done. Remember, the entire point of various people not
being in various working groups is because they don’t want to review, disclose,
or grant licenses based on updates to the documents in that working group.
While it would be nice if everyone joined the NetSec
