Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-16 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
I concur with Christophe. Adriano Il 12/04/2024 16:30, Christophe Bonjean via Cscwg-public ha scritto: Hi Martijn, Looking at the purpose of the ballot, the goal is to require *newly issued* [..] *Private Keys *to be stored in offline HSMs*.* ** The proposed change scopes this change to

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-08 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
Hi Martijn, I can't find (in the call minutes) a past discussion about that, however I assume it's fine for everyone since I haven't seen any objections. Adriano Il 08/04/2024 10:08, Martijn Katerbarg ha scritto: Hi Adriano, My apologies! It was in the past discussed about limiting

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-08 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
Hi, wouldn't it have been a little kinder to wait for an answer to the question I asked on Friday 5? It may be that the answer was obvious, but it remains unclear to me where that 72 months comes from. Adriano Il 08/04/2024 09:31, Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public ha scritto:

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: Timestamp Certificate and SubCA updates

2024-04-05 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
I also agree with the proposal, but I am not clear where does this "magic number" of 72 (months) come from... Adriano Il 04/04/2024 20:59, Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public ha scritto: Hi Ian, I like that proposal. Perhaps a minor nit is that I’d suggest we replace “new” with “newly

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: Timestamp Certificate and SubCA updates

2024-04-04 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
+1 Il 04/04/2024 04:20, Mohit Kumar via Cscwg-public ha scritto: Hi Martijn, Can I confirm that the proposal to protect private keys of Subordinate CAs in an offline state is applicable to only private keys generated for Roots/Subordinate CAs created after the effective date. Also, per my

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Voting Begins Ballot CSC-23: Marking the EV Code Signing Guidelines SUPERCEDED

2024-03-19 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
Actalis votes Yes to ballot CSC_23. Il 19/03/2024 06:28, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public ha scritto: NOTICE: Pay attention - external email - Sender is 0100018e552ecd03-f1d722ea-4427-48b2-9044-187c32294377-000...@amazonses.com Voting begins for ballot CSC-23. Purpose

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Ballot CSC-23: Marking the EV Code Signing Guidelines SUPERCEDED

2024-03-11 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
Agree. Il 11/03/2024 09:01, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public ha scritto: NOTICE: Pay attention - external email - Sender is 0100018e2c87fb77-3a70f58f-3ab3-4f1e-b532-37da8e9356a9-000...@amazonses.com Purpose of the Ballot As agreed at the F2F#61 meeting, this is a

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Marking the EV Code Signing Guidelines OBSOLETE

2024-02-28 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
+1 Il 28/02/2024 10:16, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public ha scritto: NOTICE: Pay attention - external email - Sender is 0100018def00533a-ed751293-2780-4d97-8825-f7d1841724b7-000...@amazonses.com Dear Members, As we discussed today at the F2F#61 meeting, I would like to