On 09/10/17 13:39, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> I think it's useful here to distinguish between things which are
> expected and things which are audited.
But also the source of such expectations and audits. Expectations come
from browser root programs. Audits come from auditors, as required by
browser
Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] BRs, EVGLs, and "latest version"
You're thinking
https://aka.ms/auditreqs<https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062=yJPb2f5l-vOZu1LatPZOpIhFxIGjmehgy_7SHX501A=5=https%3a%2f%2faka%2ems%2fauditreqs
it.
Thanks,
Ben
From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi via
Public
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:40 AM
To: Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
<public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] BRs, EVGLs,
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Gervase Markham via Public <
public@cabforum.org> wrote:
> During the CAB Forum face-to-face in Taipei, it was noted that the BRs
> currently state something which implies something which is not true in
> practice.
>
Gerv,
I think it's useful here to distinguish
On 06/10/17 17:26, Ben Wilson wrote:
> Would all of the browsers need to adopt some type of statement to the effect
> that "all CAs are expected to comply with the most recent version of the
> Baseline Requirements and EV Guidelines? It seems you are just moving the
> statement/requirement from
ssage-
From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase
Markham via Public
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 10:08 AM
To: CABFPub <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabfpub] BRs, EVGLs, and "latest version"
During the CAB Forum face-to-face in Taipei, it w
