Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

Hi Dimitris, Our IPR Policy is not perfect, so it doesn't have a solution for every possible scenario. It was written with a goal of balancing the interests of IP holders and the Forum membership. From the IPR Policy, "Working Groups will ordinarily not approve a Guideline if they are aware that

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

On 19/11/2021 12:03 π.μ., Tim Hollebeek wrote: The problem is that you would forcing IPR review responsibilities onto a bunch of people who explicitly tried to avoid it by not joining the working group(s) in question. This is problematic because “IPR review” isn’t just a review – you’re

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

, November 15, 2021 11:28 AM To: Clint Wilson Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) ; CABforum1 ; Tim Hollebeek Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG I am striking the following from the proposal: "If the ballot to change the NCSSRs passes the Initial

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

Zacharopoulos (HARICA) Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 11:30 AM To: Tim Hollebeek ; Ben Wilson Cc: CABforum1 Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG On 11/11/2021 5:56 μ.μ., Tim Hollebeek wrote: I don’t think it can be done. Remember, the entire point

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

d, according to the Bylaws in section 2.4-6. >> >> Wouldn't this process work? This process is still not enforcing all >> Working Groups to adopt the updated Guideline, it just completes the IP >> Review phase in the NetSec WG in a more effective/efficient way. >> >&g

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

l not enforcing all > Working Groups to adopt the updated Guideline, it just completes the IP > Review phase in the NetSec WG in a more effective/efficient way. > > > Dimitris. > > > -Tim > > *From:* Ben Wilson > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 10, 2021 10:31 AM > *To

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

> Dimitris. > >> >> -Tim >> >> From: Ben Wilson <mailto:bwil...@mozilla.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 10:31 AM >> To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <mailto:dzach...@harica.gr> >> Cc: CABforum1 <mailto:public@cabforum.or

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

*Sent:* Thursday, October 28, 2021 12:35 PM *To:* CABforum1 *Subject:* [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG All, Here is a draft charter for a Network Security Working Group.  Please provide your c

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

Zacharopoulos Cc: CABforum1 ; Tim Hollebeek Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG I can add your first point into the ballot. Does anyone have any language that would address Dimitris' second point, about enforcement across the board for the entire CAB

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

t;> working groups. While each working group does have its own unique needs >> and needs to have the ability to maintain their own requirements, there are >> lots of other cases beyond the NCSSRs where uniformity is more important, >> and now that we’re close to having all the poli

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

he ability to maintain their own requirements, there are lots >> of other cases beyond the NCSSRs where uniformity is more important, and now >> that we’re close to having all the policies in 3647 format, it’s relatively >> straightforward to maintain them in this w

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

, it’s > relatively straightforward to maintain them in this way. > > > > -Tim > > > > *From:* Public *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson > via Public > *Sent:* Thursday, October 28, 2021 12:35 PM > *To:* CABforum1 > *Subject:* [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Networ

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

7 format, it’s > relatively straightforward to maintain them in this way. > > > > -Tim > > > > *From:* Public *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson > via Public > *Sent:* Thursday, October 28, 2021 12:35 PM > *To:* CABforum1 > *Subject:* [cabfpub] Draft Working G

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

to having all the policies in 3647 format, it’s relatively straightforward to maintain them in this way. -Tim From: Public On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 12:35 PM To: CABforum1 Subject: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

[cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

All, Here is a draft charter for a Network Security Working Group. Please provide your comments, and then we will finalize this work in the form of a Forum Ballot and Server Certificate WG Ballot. Thanks, Ben Overview In January 2013 the CA/Browser Forum’s “Network and Certificate System