Hi Ian,
I like that proposal. Perhaps a minor nit is that I’d suggest we replace “new”
with “newly issued Subordinate CA certificates after that date with a
validity…”.
I’ll leave this open for discussion a few more days, and restart the discussion
period sometime next week, unless there
Ballot SMC06: Post implementation clarification and corrections
Purpose of Ballot:
The ballot proposes changes to the S/MIME Baseline Requirements to provide
clarifications and corrections arising from the implementation of the S/MIME BR
and initial audits.
The following motion has been
Hello all:
I now realize that I did not take DST into account in the timing of Ballot
SMC06. I will restart the ballot, and Tim has agreed to recast his vote.
My apologies!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Hi Martijn and all,
Thinking more about this requirement and the way folks are operating today and
I can see with this requirement CA may be constrained when they encounter a
need for greater agility to scale out. I'd like to propose a means to keep
issuing CAs for time stamping end-entity
Entrust votes Yes to ballot FORUM-021.
Bruce.
From: Public On Behalf Of Clint Wilson via Public
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 11:03 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form
Definitions and Glossary WG
Ballot
DigiCert votes YES on SMC-06.
-Tim
From: Smcwg-public On Behalf Of Stephen
Davidson via Smcwg-public
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 12:15 PM
To: smcwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: [Smcwg-public] Voting period begins for Ballot SMC06: Post
implementation clarification and corrections
DigiCert votes YES on FORUM-021.
-Tim
From: Public On Behalf Of Clint Wilson via Public
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 11:03 AM
To: CABforum1
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions
and Glossary WG
Ballot FORUM-021
Proposed by Clint Wilson of
GoDaddy votes "Yes" to FORUM-021
Best,
Brittany
From: Public on behalf of Clint Wilson via Public
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 8:03 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions
Telia votes ’Yes’ on ballot FORUM-021
//Antti
Lähettäjä: Public käyttäjän Clint Wilson via
Public puolesta
Lähetetty: torstaina, huhtikuuta 4, 2024 6:03 ip.
Vastaanottaja: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Aihe: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot
Mozilla votes "yes" on Ballot FORUM-021.
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:03 AM Clint Wilson via Public
wrote:
> *Ballot FORUM-021*
>
> Proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of
> DigiCert and Tim Callan of Sectigo.
>
> *Purpose of Ballot*
>
> The CA/Browser Forum
Ballot SMC06: Post implementation clarification and corrections
Purpose of Ballot:
The ballot proposes changes to the S/MIME Baseline Requirements to provide
clarifications and corrections arising from the implementation of the S/MIME BR
and initial audits.
The following motion has been
Ballot FORUM-021
Proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and
Tim Callan of Sectigo.
Purpose of Ballot
The CA/Browser Forum publishes Final Guidelines representing technical
requirements about nuanced and challenging PKI implementations. It is proposed
that
Hi Mohit,
> Can I confirm that the proposal to protect private keys of Subordinate CAs in
> an offline state is applicable to only private keys generated for
> Roots/Subordinate CAs created after the effective date.
You’re touching on a good point here. The way the requirement is written,
+1
Il 04/04/2024 04:20, Mohit Kumar via Cscwg-public ha scritto:
Hi Martijn,
Can I confirm that the proposal to protect private keys of Subordinate
CAs in an offline state is applicable to only private keys generated
for Roots/Subordinate CAs created after the effective date.
Also, per my
14 matches
Mail list logo
