Re: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions and Glossary WG

Buypass votes YES on ballot FORUM-021. Regards Mads From: Public On Behalf Of Clint Wilson via Public Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 5:03 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions and Glossary WG Ballot

Re: [Smcwg-public] Voting period begins for Ballot SMC06: Post implementation clarification and corrections

TWCA votes YES on SMC-06. Chya-Hung Tsai From: Smcwg-public On Behalf Of Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 12:15 AM To: smcwg-public@cabforum.org Subject: [Smcwg-public] Voting period begins for Ballot SMC06: Post implementation clarification and corrections

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions and Glossary WG

Apple votes YES on Ballot FORUM-021 > On Apr 4, 2024, at 8:03 AM, Clint Wilson via Public > wrote: > > Ballot FORUM-021 > > Proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert > and Tim Callan of Sectigo. > > Purpose of Ballot > > The CA/Browser Forum publishes

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]-Re: Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions and Glossary WG

OISTE votes Yes on Ballot FORUM-021 > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:03 AM Clint Wilson via Public > wrote: >> Ballot FORUM-021 >> >> Proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert >> and Tim Callan of Sectigo. >> >> Purpose of Ballot >>

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions and Glossary WG

Google votes Yes on Ballot FORUM-021. On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:03 AM Clint Wilson via Public wrote: > *Ballot FORUM-021* > > Proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of > DigiCert and Tim Callan of Sectigo. > > *Purpose of Ballot* > > The CA/Browser Forum publishes Final

Re: [Smcwg-public] Ballot SMC06v2: Post implementation clarification and corrections

IdenTrust votes "yes" on Ballot SMC-06v2. Regards, Od: Smcwg-public mailto:smcwg-public-boun...@cabforum.org> > w imieniu użytkownika Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public mailto:smcwg-public@cabforum.org> > Wysłane: czwartek, 4 kwietnia 2024 20:15 Do: smcwg-public@cabforum.org

[cabfpub] Final Minutes of CA/Browser Forum Meeting March 14, 2024

* These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject of this message. CA/Browser Forum Teleconference – 14 March 2024 Attendees: Aaron Poulsen - (Amazon), Adam Jones - (Microsoft), Adrian Mueller - (SwissSign), Antti Backman - (Telia Company), Brianca Martin -

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

Hi Martijn, I can't find (in the call minutes) a past discussion about that, however I assume it's fine for everyone since I haven't seen any objections. Adriano Il 08/04/2024 10:08, Martijn Katerbarg ha scritto: Hi Adriano, My apologies! It was in the past discussed about limiting

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

Hi Adriano, My apologies! It was in the past discussed about limiting timestamping to 72 or 75 months alltogether, then not requiring the SubCAs to be offline. The compromise here still allows up to 135 month timestamp certificates, if the SubCAs are offline. Mind you there’s no current

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

Hi, wouldn't it have been a little kinder to wait for an answer to the question I asked on Friday 5? It may be that the answer was obvious, but it remains unclear to me where that 72 months comes from. Adriano Il 08/04/2024 09:31, Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public ha scritto:

[Cscwg-public] [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

Purpose of the Ballot This ballot updates the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates“ version 3.7 in order to clarify language regarding Timestamp Authority Private Key Protection. The main goals of this ballot are to: 1. Require

Re: [Smcwg-public] [External Sender] Ballot SMC06v2: Post implementation clarification and corrections

OISTE votes Yes to SMC06 > > >> >> Ballot SMC06: Post implementation clarification and corrections >> >> Purpose of Ballot: >> >> The ballot proposes changes to the S/MIME Baseline Requirements to provide >> clarifications and corrections arising from the implementation of the S/MIME >>

Re: [Smcwg-public] [External Sender] Ballot SMC06v2: Post implementation clarification and corrections

Actalis votes YES on SMC-06. Il 04/04/2024 20:15, Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public ha scritto: NOTICE: Pay attention - external email - Sender is 0100018eaa5286ae-6c997690-71be-4c0d-9fe8-08b5014a3f05-000...@amazonses.com *Ballot SMC06: Post implementation clarification and corrections*