Re: [Smcwg-public] NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD – SMCWG BALLOT SMC06

2024-04-16 Thread Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public
Thanks Bruce. The link should be working again:

Re: [Smcwg-public] NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD – SMCWG BALLOT SMC06

2024-04-16 Thread Bruce Morton via Smcwg-public
The redline document does not appear to clearly show the changes to be reviewed. Thanks, Bruce. From: Smcwg-public On Behalf Of Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 2:41 PM To: smcwg-public@cabforum.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Smcwg-public] NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD –

[cabfpub] Draft Charter for IPR Subcommittee

2024-04-16 Thread Ben Wilson via Public
All, As mentioned during the Forum teleconference of April 11, 2024, here is a draft charter for a Forum IPR Subcommittee. (This effort is separate, but somewhat in parallel to the work of the Patent Advisory Group, which will be handling GoDaddy's Patent Exclusion Notice, filed Mar. 22, 2024, in

[Smcwg-public] Draft Minutes of SMCWG April 10, 2024

2024-04-16 Thread Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public
## Minutes of SMCWG April 10, 2024 These are the Draft Minutes of the meeting described in the subject of this message. Corrections and clarifications where needed are encouraged by reply. ## Attendees Abhishek Bhat - (eMudhra), Adrian Mueller - (SwissSign), Adriano Santoni -

[Cscwg-public] CSCWG Agenda April 18, 2024

2024-04-16 Thread Dean Coclin via Cscwg-public
MINUTE TAKER: NEED A VOLUNTEER, START RECORDING Bruce will run the meeting as I have a conflict this week 1. Roll Call 2. Antitrust reminder 3. Approve prior meeting minutes - F2F (Andrea), March 21st (Brianca), April 4th (Scott) 4. Proposed ballots: Remove EV Guideline

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-16 Thread Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
Hi Christophe, Adriano, Thank you for the comments. I kind of think this may be a slight mismatch between what’s listed as the purpose of the ballot, vs the language included in the redline. However, I’m not sure I agree with your solution: > I would recommend to scope this change to

Re: [Cscwg-public] [External Sender] Re: [Discussion Period Begins] CSC-24 (v2): Timestamping Private Key Protection

2024-04-16 Thread Adriano Santoni via Cscwg-public
I concur with Christophe. Adriano Il 12/04/2024 16:30, Christophe Bonjean via Cscwg-public ha scritto: Hi Martijn, Looking at the purpose of the ballot, the goal is to require *newly issued* [..] *Private Keys *to be stored in offline HSMs*.* ** The proposed change scopes this change to