Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Dominic
Should this be stipulated as part of a license agreement? Dominic From: Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com To: public-lod@w3.org public-lod@w3.org Sent: Saturday, 30 March 2013, 14:35 Subject: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Dominic Oldman
All, Sorry, the body of my last message didn't seem to appear on the list. I had a question about licensing. Should licenses try to get web publishers to embed original URIs into web implementations - a sort of invisible attribution - where practical, and is this practical and/or

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Young,Jeff (OR)
We use ODC-By with a special cases clause for some of our datasets to account for Linked Data situations. Thoughts and comments about this approach would be welcome. http://purl.oclc.org/dataset/WorldCat http://viaf.org/viaf/data Jeff Sent from my iPad On Mar 31, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Dominic

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Michael Brunnbauer
Hello Dominic, On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 02:57:38PM +0100, Dominic Oldman wrote: I had a question about licensing. Should licenses try to get web publishers to embed original URIs into web implementations - a sort of invisible attribution - where practical, and is this practical and/or

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Young,Jeff (OR)
I disagree. LOD is about linking to more information. Carrying URIs helps serendipitous downstream consumers. This isn't merely attribution. Jeff Sent from my iPad On Mar 31, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Michael Brunnbauer bru...@netestate.de wrote: Hello Dominic, On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/31/13 11:23 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote: I disagree. LOD is about linking to more information. Carrying URIs helps serendipitous downstream consumers. This isn't merely attribution. +1000... Kingsley Jeff Sent from my iPad On Mar 31, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Michael Brunnbauer

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/31/13 7:42 AM, Dominic wrote: Should this be stipulated as part of a license agreement? CC-BY-SA is an example of such a license. Kingsley Dominic *From:* Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com *To:*

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
All the CC-BY licenses require attribution in the a manner specified by the licensor. What needs to be done is that if you release work under a CC license you should specify that you consider the work properly attributed if the licensee includes the original uri in their publications., The SA

Re: Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?

2013-03-31 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/31/13 2:54 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: All the CC-BY licenses require attribution in the a manner specified by the licensor. What needs to be done is that if you release work under a CC license you should specify that you consider the work properly attributed if the licensee includes the

Re: uri for uri

2013-03-31 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 1 April 2013 01:13, Christopher Gutteridge c...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising.. Thanks for the pointer! The single most important development in the history of the Semantic

Re: uri for uri

2013-03-31 Thread Uche Ogbuji
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.comwrote: On 1 April 2013 01:13, Christopher Gutteridge c...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising.. Thanks

Re: uri for uri

2013-03-31 Thread Lee Feigenbaum
As a beta user who's been using this service for about a year now, I can attest that it is everything it claims to be and more. Love it and can't recommend it highly enough. Lee On 3/31/2013 7:13 PM, Christopher Gutteridge wrote: Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to

Re: uri for uri

2013-03-31 Thread Hugh Glaser
Yes, me too. It's great to see their excellent stuff get more visibility. Well spotted, Chris. Hugh On 1 Apr 2013, at 04:05, Lee Feigenbaum l...@thefigtrees.net wrote: As a beta user who's been using this service for about a year now, I can attest that it is everything it claims to be and

dataset with holidays and sport events

2013-03-31 Thread Joakim Soderberg
Hi, Can anyone tell me if there is a SPARQL endpoint for US/European holidays and US Sports events (NFL, MLB etc)? thanks /J