Re: [PVE-User] NAT Problems with PVE Firewall

Hello, thank you, it works. But it will not bypass any firewall rules? Regards, Elias Werberich Am 21.06.2017 um 21:12 schrieb Yannick Palanque: > Le 2017-06-21 18:26, Elias Werberich a écrit : >> Using SNAT instead of MASQUERADE does not solve the problem. >> In a pve-devel thread [2] I read

Re: [PVE-User] [pve-devel] Proxmox VE 5.0 beta2 released!

And when PVE 5 comes out?? 2017-06-19 3:29 GMT-03:00 Emmanuel Kasper : > > In the meantime, I assume I can install proxmox beta on debian 9 stable ? > > To start playing with the API, make sure our applications will still work > > fine, maybe start adding some Cloud-Init

Re: [PVE-User] NAT Problems with PVE Firewall

Le 2017-06-21 18:26, Elias Werberich a écrit : Using SNAT instead of MASQUERADE does not solve the problem. In a pve-devel thread [2] I read that the following rules should help, but it does not work either. post-up iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -s '10.0.0.0/24' -i vmbr12 -j CT --zone 1

[PVE-User] NAT Problems with PVE Firewall

Dear Proxmox Group, I am currently trying to configure a simple NAT with PVE Firewall enabled. As long as I do not enable the firewall on the VM network interface, the wiki solution [1] works perfectly. PVE Firewall is enabled on datacenter and node level. --- BEGIN: /etc/network/interfaces

Re: [PVE-User] Container cant start - Ceph Storage

Problem was solved by my self. Problem was that the Container is already running on another Host. -- Grüsse Daniel Am 21.06.17, 13:21 schrieb "pve-user im Auftrag von Daniel" : Hi there, i have a problem.

[PVE-User] Container cant start - Ceph Storage

Hi there, i have a problem. After my cluster crashes again I cant start 2 nodes which runs on a Ceph Storage. I got this error: lxc-start -name 215 -F lxc-start: cgroups/cgfsng.c: create_path_for_hierarchy: 1317 Path "/sys/fs/cgroup/systemd//lxc/ame" already existed. lxc-start: