Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.10.0-rc1

+1 to release. I successfully ran my standard PyLucene smoke test of indexing the first 100K enwiki documents, running a couple queries, force merging to one segment, and running again. This was on Python 3.11, OpenJDK 21, Arch Linux kernel 6.4.1. I am sad that this may be the last official

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.7.0-rc1

+1 I ran the same exciting smoke test -- indexing first 100K enwiki docs, running a few political searches, force merging, searching again. Everything ran fine! Arch Linux kernel 6.3.2, Java 17.0.7+7, Python 3.11.3. Sorry for the delay! Mike On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 3:28 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.6.0-rc1

+1 I ran my usual smoke test: index the first 100K English wikipedia documents, force merge to one segment, and run a few searches successfully. Thanks Andi! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 7:44 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 9.6.0 (rc1)

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.4.1-rc3

+1 to release. Sorry for taking so long! I ran my usual smoke test -- index first 100 K docs from an English Wikipedia export, force merge and run a couple queries. One quirk during installation is I had to add "with_modern_setuptools = True" in JCC's setup.py before all the logic for

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.4.1

A Halloween release! I will try to VOTE today. Mike On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:17 AM Benjamin Trent wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 6:50 PM Jeff Breidenbach > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 3:50 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > > > > > > > The PyLucene 9.4.1 (rc1) release

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.1.0 (rc4)

Thanks for all the testing Andi! On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:21 AM Andi Vajda wrote: > > I installed python 3.10.4 on macos from sources. > It came with setuptools 58.1.0. > > I was able to build jcc shared without forcing with_modern_setuptools. > I then ran pip install --upgrade setuptools and

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.1.0 (rc4)

+1 to release. I ran my usual smoke test, indexing first 100K Wikipedia docs, running a couple queries, force merging down to one segment and running them again. I discovered in this process that IndexWriter.getReader() had been removed and tracked down the change that did that (it's good,

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2

+1 to release! I was able to install this on arch linux box (beast3 ), and do the usual smoke test (index first 100K English Wikipedia docs, force merge to one segment and run a couple queries successfully).

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.11.0

+1 I ran my usual smoke test -- building and installing the src, and then indexing first 100K English Wikipedia docs, force merging to one segment, and running a couple searches successfully. Mike On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:03 PM Nelia Vb wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 9:34 PM Andi

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.9.0

+1 What an awesome quick turnaround on the Lucene release to PyLucene release! I ran my usual smoke test, indexing first 100K docs of English Wikipedia export, force merging, and running a couple queries. I tested on JDK 15.0.1 on Arch Linux and Python 3.9.3. Mike McCandless

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 I ran my usual smoke test: install JCC, PyLucene, then index and optimize the first 100K documents from a Wikipedia English snapshot, and run a couple queries. Sorry for being late to the party too! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:35 PM Andi Vajda

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.6.1

+1 to release. I ran my usual smoke test to index, forceMerge and search the first 100K documents from English Wikipedia export, on Arch Linux, Java 1.11.06, Python 3.8.1 -- test ran fine! Thanks Andi. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 7:56 PM Andi Vajda

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.3.0 (fwd)

ndi. > > Thanks Dawid ! > > This vote has now passed. I should be moving the artifacts to release > shortly. > > Andi.. > > > > > > D. > > > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:54 PM Michael McCandless > >> wrote: > >> > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.3.0 (fwd)

IndexWriter.numDocs() to IndexWriter.getDocStats().numDocs :) And then it ran correctly. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:53 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > I will review and vote soon! > > Sorry for the

Re: Installation error - No such file or directory: 'javac'

Likely the "sudo" env does not have javac on its PATH? Try "sudo which javac" (if you use bash, or any shell that has the "which" command). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:51 AM NDelt wrote: > I'm trying to install PyLucene on Ubuntu Linux and WSL,

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 7.6.0 (rc1)

+1 to release! I ran my usual simple test indexing the first 100K docs from an old wikipedia export, force merging, and running a few searches. Thank you for continuing to release PyLucene Andi! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:59 PM Andi Vajda wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.5.0 (rc2) (now with Python 3 support)

+1 to release; I ran my same "first 100K Wikipedia documents" smoke test, on Python 3.5.2, Java 1.8.0_121, Ubuntu 16.04. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > A few fixes were needed in JCC for better Windows

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1)

+1 to release. I ran my usual smoke test: indexing first 100K docs from English Wikipedia export, optimizing, running a couple searches, on Ubuntu 16.04, Java 1.8.0_101, Python 2.7.12. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Michael McCandless <

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1)

Sorry, I will have a look! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > Ping ? > Two more PMC votes are needed before this release can happen. > Thanks ! > > Andi.. > >> On Feb 6, 2017, at 13:38, Andi Vajda

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.2.0 (rc2)

+1 to release! I installed on Ubuntu 16.04, Python 2.7, Java 1.8.0_101 and ran my usual test, indexing first 100K Wikipedia English documents and running a couple searches. Thanks Andi. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Andi Vajda

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 4.10.1-1

+1 to release I ran my usual smoke test, indexing, optimizing searching first 100 K Wikipedia English docs... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: The PyLucene 4.10.1-1 release tracking the recent release of

Re: [nag] [VOTE] Release PyLucene 4.7.2-1

+1 to release. I ran my usual smoke test: index first 100 K Wikipedia english docs and do a few searches. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: The PyLucene 4.7.2-1 release tracking Tuesday's release of Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 4.5.1-1

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Michael McCandless wrote: +1 to release. However, when I ran the last step (sudo make install) it ended with this error: Installed /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/lucene-4.5.1-py2.7-macosx-10.8

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 4.5.1-1

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Michael McCandless wrote: +1 to release. However, when I ran the last step (sudo make install) it ended

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 4.3.1-1

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, 30 Jun 2013, Michael McCandless wrote: Hmm I see two test failures, on Linux, Python 2.7.3, Java 1.7.0_07 : ERROR: testCachingWorks (__main__.CachingWrapperFilterTestCase

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 3.6.2

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: I tested on OS X 10.8.2, and was able to install run my usual smoke test (index search first 100K Wikipedia docs). But I hit a few strange things ... first, lots of compilation warnings when compiling jcc and pylucene, eg:

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-12) Add PythonReusableAnalyzerBase, so we can create analyzers in Python

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Michael McCandless (Commented) (JIRA) wrote: RE the exception inside createComponents... strange!  Your exception indeed has all the details (ie, shows the original traceback, from the createComponents

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-12) Add PythonReusableAnalyzerBase, so we can create analyzers in Python

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Michael McCandless (Commented) (JIRA) wrote: RE the exception inside createComponents... strange!  Your exception indeed

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-12) Add PythonReusableAnalyzerBase, so we can create analyzers in Python

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: Just to be certain: how can I validate I truly succeeded in shared linking for the lucene extension...?  I'm on linux... when I run nm on the _lucene.so, what should I look for to confirm I succeeded...? Use ldd (with the

[jira] [Updated] (PYLUCENE-15) Add spellchecker JAR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated PYLUCENE-15: --- Attachment: PYLUCENE-15.patch Patch, to just the Makefile to add SPELLCHECKER_JAR

[jira] [Created] (PYLUCENE-14) Add PythonIndexDeletionPolicy so we can implement IndexDeletionPolicy in Python

: PyLucene Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Michael McCandless -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more

[jira] [Updated] (PYLUCENE-14) Add PythonIndexDeletionPolicy so we can implement IndexDeletionPolicy in Python

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated PYLUCENE-14: --- Attachment: PYLUCENE-14.patch Straightforward patch w/ test case

[jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-12) Add PythonReusableAnalyzerBase, so we can create analyzers in Python

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13157322#comment-13157322 ] Michael McCandless commented on PYLUCENE-12: One small fix to the patch: we

[jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-12) Add PythonReusableAnalyzerBase, so we can create analyzers in Python

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155389#comment-13155389 ] Michael McCandless commented on PYLUCENE-12: I noticed one unfriendliness

[jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-12) Add PythonReusableAnalyzerBase, so we can create analyzers in Python

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155397#comment-13155397 ] Michael McCandless commented on PYLUCENE-12: Hmm, one more unfriendliness

possible JCC bug when slicing a JArray?

If I run this: import lucene import types arr = lucene.JArray(types.IntType)([1, 2, 3, 4]) it makes a length 4 int array, initialized with 1, 2, 3, 4. But then if I try to slice this array like this: print arr[0:] it prints: [1, 2, 3] but I think it should print:

SIGSEGV if I give wrong args to IndexWriterConfig ctor

Does anyone else see this? import lucene lucene.initVM() lucene.IndexWriterConfig(lucene.Version.LUCENE_34) -- SIGSEGV? IndexWriterConfig expects an analyzer as a 2nd argument... but I would expect a nice lucene.InvalidArgsError instead (that's what I hit if I pass no args to IWC).

Re: SIGSEGV if I give wrong args to IndexWriterConfig ctor

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Andi Vajda wrote: Hi Mike, On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Michael McCandless wrote: Does anyone else see this?  import lucene  lucene.initVM()  lucene.IndexWriterConfig(lucene.Version.LUCENE_34

Re: SIGSEGV if I give wrong args to IndexWriterConfig ctor

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Andi Vajda wrote: I need to take a closer look about what's different with this class. Strange... As long as I pass the analyzer as the 2nd arg (as I'm supposed to!) everything works fine; it's only

Re: SynonymAnalyzer(s) in PyLucene34

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: So, I downloaded the new version of the samples, hoping to find a new version of the wordnet index. But first, following instructions in README, running 'ant test' in the lia2e directory fails with:    Testcase:

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 3.3.0

:  Hi Mike, On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Michael McCandless wrote: Re-send, this time to pylucene-dev: Everything looks good -- I was able to compile, run all tests successfully, and run my usual smoke test (indexing optimizing searching on first 100K wikipedia docs), but... I then tried

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 3.1.0

+1 to release I installed on Mac OS X 10.6.6, and ran my usual smoke test (indexing first 100K docs from Wikipedia, optimizing, running a few queries). Looks good! Mike http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: The PyLucene 3.1.0-1

Re: [VOTE] [Take 3] Release PyLucene 2.9.4-1 and 3.0.3-1

+1 Mike On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: A patch that improves the finding of jni.h on Mac OS X was integrated. It made it worth blocking this release and preparing new release artifacts. No one voted on the [Take 2] artifacts and I hope this is not

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.4-1 and 3.0.3-1

+1 to both. I installed both on Linux (Fedora 13) and ran my test python script that indexes first 100K line docs from wikipedia and runs a few searches. No problems! Mike On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: With the recent releases of Lucene Java 2.9.4 and

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag)

+1 to release. I used both releases to index first 100K docs from a Wikipedia export, then ran several searches. All looks good. Also, both releases produce identical search results. Mike On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: With the recent - simultaneous -

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1

OK thanks Andi, +1 to release! (minor comments below) Mike On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote: On Nov 7, 2009, at 2:44, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Signature md5 check out. I got everything working and ran my usual basic index

Free live video streaming of ApacheCon US 2009

Team, For those Lucene fanatics not in Oakland this week for ApacheCon US, don't miss the FREE live video streaming, starting today: http://streaming.linux-magazin.de/en/program-apachecon-us-2009.htm Note that there are many talks available, covering Apache Hadoop, Apache HTTPD, Lucene, as

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

Bill Janssen wrote: Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Bill Janssen wrote: Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: But why do I have two separate 2.5 Python installs, compiled w/ different options, in the first place? It's weird and I'd like to fix it, I

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

in the Makefile: PREFIX_PYTHON=/usr ANT=ant PYTHON=$(PREFIX_PYTHON)/bin/python JCC=$(PYTHON) -m jcc --shared NUM_FILES=2 This must be something silly in my env... Mike On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Christian Heimes wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: Weird, that was not what I was seeing. I think I cd'd

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.4.1

Bill Janssen wrote: Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: A OK; this is quite confusing. Everyone seems to find it so. I advise Mac users at PARC to just use the system Python (unless and until they really know what they are doing). I

Re: preparing for a PyLucene release

Andi Vajda wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: I think this is a good idea! There were discussions late last year to do a 2.9 release for Lucene, but realistically it's probably a ways out still. Even a 2.4.1 release, just bug fixes ? Possibly we'll do a 2.4.1

Re: preparing for a PyLucene release

I think this is a good idea! There were discussions late last year to do a 2.9 release for Lucene, but realistically it's probably a ways out still. The Lucene java release checklist might be a good place to check for the typical things: