Hi Phil,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Phil wrote:
Great - I've attached a one-line change that outputs the missing info to
stdout. I haven't added a command line switch at this stage as there is
no functional change to the output - just an extra line of logging.
Yes, a flag is not necessary for
Hi Andi,
Great - I've attached a one-line change that outputs the missing info to
stdout. I haven't added a command line switch at this stage as there is
no functional change to the output - just an extra line of logging.
Note this is necessary because although the program already outputs the
Hi Phil,
Excellent !
Yes, I'd accept a patch that makes your feature available via a new command
line flag to JCC (don't forget to document it in __main__.py).
It's ok to only send in a patch for the python3 version (under jcc3). The
python2 version (under jcc2) is maintenance only,
Thanks very much for the reply Andi.
I've done a bit more digging and the short answer is you can't do what I
wanted with the current JCC. but, it turns out it was fairly
straightforward to tweak JCC to provide me with the all details I needed.
I successfully made this work today with Guix
Hi Phil,
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021, Phil wrote:
I currently use jcc to wrap a Java library for use in Python - it works
great.
The project I'm working on is moving it's package management from
traditional pip installs to Guix:
https://guix.gnu.org/
Guix handles python packages pretty well, and
Hi,
I currently use jcc to wrap a Java library for use in Python - it works
great.
The project I'm working on is moving it's package management from
traditional pip installs to Guix:
https://guix.gnu.org/
Guix handles python packages pretty well, and I have jcc running nicely on
there.
The
