[issue29456] bugs in unicodedata.normalize: u1176, u11a7 and u11c3

Xiang Zhang added the comment: As I said, I checked Unicode 3.0 for the hangul composition algorithm. It looks consistent with Unicode 4.1+. 3.0 only gets description but no sample implementation. So I think the changed code also applies to Unicode 3.0+. --

[issue33859] Spelling mistakes found using aspell

Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan : -- pull_requests: +7358 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33859] Spelling mistakes found using aspell

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 416e488415cacec98778da11da401c1b94d92c10 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-33859: Fix spelling mistakes in docs. (GH-7691) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/416e488415cacec98778da11da401c1b94d92c10 -- nosy:

[issue33865] [EASY] Missing code page aliases: "unknown encoding: 874"

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Of course entries in the alias table should have a precedence. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33499] Environment variable to set alternate location for pycache tree

Change by Nick Coghlan : -- pull_requests: +7357 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33865] [EASY] Missing code page aliases: "unknown encoding: 874"

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: There are certain encodings as I went through the file Lib/encodings/aliases.py where there are all digit items that doesn't correspond to cp sequence. I think the search function is used not only for encodings that start with 'cp' and thus

[issue33859] Spelling mistakes found using aspell

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7356 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33859] Spelling mistakes found using aspell

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset c151f7846d6d900c22edaaa77f5f7771b529099e by Serhiy Storchaka (Xtreak) in branch 'master': bpo-33859: Fix spelling mistakes in docs. (GH-7691) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c151f7846d6d900c22edaaa77f5f7771b529099e -- nosy:

[issue33499] Environment variable to set alternate location for pycache tree

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Merged as PYTHONPYCACHEPREFIX=path, -X pycache_prefix=path and sys.pycache_prefix :) I'll also update PEP 304 with a note saying a variant of the idea was eventually accepted for Python 3.8. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved

[issue33499] Environment variable to set alternate location for pycache tree

Nick Coghlan added the comment: New changeset b193fa996a746111252156f11fb14c12fd6267e6 by Nick Coghlan (Carl Meyer) in branch 'master': bpo-33499: Add PYTHONPYCACHEPREFIX env var for alt bytecode cache location. (GH-6834)

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 8e6428f21699e15b5d96f949db221f20d8466b4b by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.6': bpo-33571: Improve the glossary description for '...' prompt (GH-6971) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8e6428f21699e15b5d96f949db221f20d8466b4b

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 380a2b09e8c78b1222f9295e82e7ef34a0e70d99 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-33571: Improve the glossary description for '...' prompt (GH-6971) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/380a2b09e8c78b1222f9295e82e7ef34a0e70d99

[issue33836] [Good first-time issue] Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 2636833e8e9cb16ba3ae7bf776bbfc91f176367c by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.6': bpo-33836: Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ (GH-7687) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/2636833e8e9cb16ba3ae7bf776bbfc91f176367c

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7354 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 80c51c4737c6bb51dd76d2ab6c5f7ea75bf118f2 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '2.7': bpo-33571: Improve the glossary description for '...' prompt (GH-6971) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/80c51c4737c6bb51dd76d2ab6c5f7ea75bf118f2

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7353 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

Mariatta Wijaya added the comment: Thanks! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

New submission from Mariatta Wijaya : New changeset 68680035143a3a6398faa88f067f244c74691d19 by Mariatta (Andrés Delfino) in branch 'master': bpo-33571: Improve the glossary description for '...' prompt (GH-6971) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/68680035143a3a6398faa88f067f244c74691d19

[issue33571] Add triple quotes to list of delimiters that trigger '...' prompt

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7355 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33836] [Good first-time issue] Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 5a0bf74d4ec11a246b401896cbfb2e840c13da40 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-33836: Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ (GH-7687) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5a0bf74d4ec11a246b401896cbfb2e840c13da40

[issue33876] doc Mention the MicroPython implementation in Introduction

Carol Willing added the comment: A reasonable suggestion. Let's make sure that we mention CircuitPython as well. -- nosy: +willingc ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33836] [Good first-time issue] Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ

Mariatta Wijaya added the comment: Thanks! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33877] doc Mention Windows along UNIX for script running instructions

Change by Andrés Delfino : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +7352 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33877] doc Mention Windows along UNIX for script running instructions

New submission from Andrés Delfino : Reference 9.1. says: "Under Unix, a complete program can be passed to the interpreter in three forms...". This also applies to Windows. PR fixes this. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 319703 nosy: adelfino, docs@python

[issue33836] [Good first-time issue] Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7350 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33836] [Good first-time issue] Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7351 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33836] [Good first-time issue] Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ

Mariatta Wijaya added the comment: New changeset 2707e41a5c7ede30349cc7dbd66f8be564965d7c by Mariatta (Noah Haasis) in branch 'master': bpo-33836: Recommend keyword-only param for memoization in FAQ (GH-7687) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/2707e41a5c7ede30349cc7dbd66f8be564965d7c

[issue29456] bugs in unicodedata.normalize: u1176, u11a7 and u11c3

Ma Lin added the comment: > We have a ucd_3_2_0 in unicodedata. Probably this 3.2 unicodedata is used for IDNA2003. In IDNA2003 there is a step: normalize the domain_name string to Unicode Normalization Form C. Now we changed the Composition code of Hangul to Unicode Standard 4.1+, and

[issue33876] doc Mention the MicroPython implementation in Introduction

Change by Andrés Delfino : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +7349 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33876] doc Mention the MicroPython implementation in Introduction

New submission from Andrés Delfino : IMHO, mentioning MicroPython is a plus because it's a mature project with a focus not covered by any of the other mentioned implementations. PR adds the mention. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 319700 nosy: adelfino,

[issue33875] Allow dynamic password evaluation in pypirc configuration file.

Change by Joel Perras : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +7348 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33875] Allow dynamic password evaluation in pypirc configuration file.

New submission from Joel Perras : In its current implementation, a user is required to provide their cleartext PyPi password in their .pypirc configuration file for authenticated interactions with PyPi servers to succeed. For hopefully obvious reasons, this is sub-optimal from a security

[issue33874] dictviews set operations do not follow pattern of set or frozenset

Forest added the comment: Issue https://bugs.python.org/issue24413 also flags a difference in the behavior between dictviews and sets/frozensets. "for non-iterable object x, set().__or__(x) raises NotImplementedError, but {}.keys().__or__(x) raises TypeError" Issue

[issue33874] dictviews set operations do not follow pattern of set or frozenset

Forest added the comment: Sorry there was a typo in the first example block: It should be >>> {}.keys() & [] set() >>> set() & [] Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for &: 'set' and 'list' >>> set() & [] does **not** return set()

[issue33874] dictviews set operations do not follow pattern of set or frozenset

New submission from Forest : Views of dictionary keys and items admit set operations, but the behavior of operations differs significantly from that of set and frozenset. >>> {}.keys() & [] set() >>> set() & [] Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: unsupported

[issue24379] Add operator.subscript as a convenience for creating slices

Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- resolution: -> rejected stage: commit review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue24379] Add operator.subscript as a convenience for creating slices

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Let's close it. Just because someone spent a lot of effort on a patch we don't have to accept it. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33873] False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset cac4fef8860e66a9da67d09762f5b614b9471a12 by Victor Stinner (Pablo Galindo) in branch 'master': bpo-33873: regrtest: Add warning on -R 1:3 (GH-7736) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cac4fef8860e66a9da67d09762f5b614b9471a12 --

[issue33873] False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1

Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Updated PR7735 with the checks for invalid parameters. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33826] enable discovery of class source code in IPython interactively defined classes

Ivan Pozdeev added the comment: Oh, I see, you want to be able to get the source for code entered into the interactive session. IPython does this by creating a separate fake "file name" for every input and adding corresponding entries for them into `linecache.cache'. This doesn't work for

[issue33873] False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1

STINNER Victor added the comment: I tested PR 7735: vstinner@apu$ ./python -m test -R 0:0 test_os -m test_access Run tests sequentially 0:00:00 load avg: 0.19 [1/1] test_os beginning 0 repetitions test_os leaked [] references, sum=0 test_os leaked [] memory blocks, sum=0 test_os failed ==

[issue33873] False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1

Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +7347 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33873] False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1

Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +7346 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33873] False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1

Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Let's make the buildbots happier! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue33873] False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1

Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- title: False positives when running refleaks tests with -R 1:1 -> False positives when running leak tests with -R 1:1 ___ Python tracker

[issue33873] False positives when running refleaks tests with -R 1:1

STINNER Victor added the comment: > test_list leaked [3] memory blocks, sum=3 Memory block leaks are very different from reference leaks. Memory block are low level allocations. Python has *many* internal caches: tuple uses an internal "free list" for example. The first runs of the tests (2

[issue33855] IDLE: Minimally test every non-startup module.

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- pull_requests: +7345 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33873] False positives when running refleaks tests with -R 1:1

New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado : I am not sure is a problem we can do something about but right know if you run the refleak tests with low repetitions it reports leaks: ./python -m test test_list -R 1:1 Run tests sequentially 0:00:00 load avg: 0.66 [1/1] test_list beginning 2

[issue33855] IDLE: Minimally test every non-startup module.

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 508568764593dca3844a51c10f1493413a51d66f by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-33855: Minimally test all IDLE modules. (GH-7689) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/508568764593dca3844a51c10f1493413a51d66f -- nosy:

[issue33824] Settign LANG=C modifies the --version behavior

STINNER Victor added the comment: Ned: I let you decide if this bug should be backported to 3.7.0 final or not. I would prefer to see this fix in 3.7.0, since Py_Main() refactoring was complex and maybe this bug hides another bug. The memset() is safe and make the code more reliable.

[issue32030] PEP 432: Rewrite Py_Main()

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 046da1669598d6112d0a6fb056081f3eb5a4d4e7 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-33824, bpo-32030: Fix pymain_read_conf() (GH-7712) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/046da1669598d6112d0a6fb056081f3eb5a4d4e7 -- nosy:

[issue33824] Settign LANG=C modifies the --version behavior

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 046da1669598d6112d0a6fb056081f3eb5a4d4e7 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-33824, bpo-32030: Fix pymain_read_conf() (GH-7712) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/046da1669598d6112d0a6fb056081f3eb5a4d4e7 -- nosy:

[issue33855] IDLE: Minimally test every non-startup module.

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7344 stage: test needed -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue33855] IDLE: Minimally test every non-startup module.

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset ee5ef309c7e2daef1248730145408f700732c42e by Terry Jan Reedy in branch 'master': bpo-33855: Minimally test all IDLE modules. (GH-7689) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/ee5ef309c7e2daef1248730145408f700732c42e --

[issue32030] PEP 432: Rewrite Py_Main()

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7343 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33824] Settign LANG=C modifies the --version behavior

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7342 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32030] PEP 432: Rewrite Py_Main()

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 6c5a4b315664f21bffc36ff6987fb4c4d1590897 by Victor Stinner in branch 'master': bpo-33824, bpo-32030: Fix pymain_read_conf() (GH-7712) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6c5a4b315664f21bffc36ff6987fb4c4d1590897 --

[issue29367] python-gdb: display wrapper_call()

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset e36f94f204f3257a206a7766464a94230337fd18 by Victor Stinner in branch '2.7': bpo-32962: Backport python-gdb.py and test_gdb.py from master (GH-7726) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e36f94f204f3257a206a7766464a94230337fd18 --

[issue33824] Settign LANG=C modifies the --version behavior

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 6c5a4b315664f21bffc36ff6987fb4c4d1590897 by Victor Stinner in branch 'master': bpo-33824, bpo-32030: Fix pymain_read_conf() (GH-7712) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6c5a4b315664f21bffc36ff6987fb4c4d1590897 --

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset e36f94f204f3257a206a7766464a94230337fd18 by Victor Stinner in branch '2.7': bpo-32962: Backport python-gdb.py and test_gdb.py from master (GH-7726) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e36f94f204f3257a206a7766464a94230337fd18 --

[issue33872] doc Add list access time to list definition

Change by Andrés Delfino : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +7341 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33872] doc Add list access time to list definition

New submission from Andrés Delfino : Glossary talks about list access complexity, but the actual list definition doesn't. I think glossary entries should have more information than actual definitions. PR adds list access complexity to list definition. -- assignee: docs@python

[issue33869] doc Add set, frozen set, and tuple entries to Glossary

Andrés Delfino added the comment: I thought since dictionary and list is there, tuple/set/frozenset should be, too. But I think you are right. I'd keep the link to the list definition, though. I didn't add a link to the dictionary definition as "dictionary" seems to be a very open term.

[issue32718] Install PowerShell activation scripts for venv for all platforms

Brett Cannon added the comment: The prompt issues I was having are fixed in PowerShell 6.1.0-preview3, so as soon at 6.1.0 reaches final I will start working on this again. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue29367] python-gdb: display wrapper_call()

Change by STINNER Victor : -- pull_requests: +7340 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

Change by STINNER Victor : -- pull_requests: +7339 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset ba67b4f7cb87035e24098f52cf9711b9e793e033 by Victor Stinner in branch '3.7': Revert "bpo-32962: Fix test_gdb failure in debug build with -mcet -fcf-protection -O0 (GH-6754)" (#7724)

[issue33869] doc Add set, frozen set, and tuple entries to Glossary

Change by Fred L. Drake, Jr. : -- nosy: +fdrake ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 74565aa6d54344d4994c6b81d6fd05a4258283ab by Victor Stinner in branch '3.6': Revert "bpo-32962: Fix test_gdb failure in debug build with -mcet -fcf-protection -O0 (GH-6754)" (#7725)

[issue33869] doc Add set, frozen set, and tuple entries to Glossary

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: This probably shouldn't be done. It is not the goal of the glossary to define all built-in types. We have other sections of the documentation for that purpose. Also, there is no demonstrated need. -- nosy: +rhettinger

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 2f9cbaa8b2190b6dfd3157ede9b6973523a3b939 by Victor Stinner in branch 'master': Revert "bpo-32962: Fix test_gdb failure in debug build with -mcet -fcf-protection -O0 (GH-6754)" (#7723)

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

Change by STINNER Victor : -- pull_requests: +7338 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

Change by STINNER Victor : -- pull_requests: +7337 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Oh :-( The change caused two buildbot failures, so I wrote PR 7723 to revert > it. It seems to only be related to this change: """ New changeset 9b7c74ca32d1bec7128d550a9ab1b2ddc7046287 by Victor Stinner (Marcel Plch) in branch 'master': bpo-32962: Fix

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg319670 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: test_gdb is failing on the following buildbots: x86 Gentoo Non-Debug http://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/99/builds/1095 AMD64 Debian PGO 3.x http://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/47/builds/1173 Gentoo Non-Debug with X 3.7

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

STINNER Victor added the comment: Oh :-( The change caused two buildbot failures, so I wrote PR 7723 to revert it. x86 Gentoo Non-Debug with X 3.x: http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/99/builds/1095 == FAIL:

[issue32962] test_gdb fails in debug build with `-mcet -fcf-protection -O0`

Change by STINNER Victor : -- pull_requests: +7336 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33855] IDLE: Minimally test every non-startup module.

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: debugger and debugger_r: tests are subminimal because instantiating classes is not trivial. dynoption: skipped because I expect it will be replaced and deleted when I review PR to do so. editor: I discovered, or rediscovered, a new shutdown issue, with

[issue33858] A typo in multiprocessing documentation

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Ok, I've backported to 3.6 in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7721 -- components: +Library (Lib) resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker

[issue33854] doc Add PEP title in seealso of Built-in Types

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- assignee: docs@python -> terry.reedy resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33854] doc Add PEP title in seealso of Built-in Types

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset ae4b2af42ce908cd3872dd4442c9805beb725167 by Terry Jan Reedy (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.6': bpo-33854: Add PEP 461 title to 'See also' note (GH-7688) (GH-7720)

[issue33826] enable discovery of class source code in IPython interactively defined classes

Thomas Viehmann added the comment: So I want "inspect.showsource" to have the same output whether my class has been defined in a .py or in my Jupyter notebook. I appreciate there are limitations to what "inspect.showsource" can do, but I am not so sure how that creates uncertainty my

[issue33854] doc Add PEP title in seealso of Built-in Types

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset ce1bda774ee28fcdc8966e4158ed42b1246a29d0 by Terry Jan Reedy (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.7': bpo-33854: Add PEP 461 title to 'See also' note (GH-7688) (#7719)

[issue33847] doc: Add '@' operator entry to index

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33858] A typo in multiprocessing documentation

Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: And this PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/698 -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33858] A typo in multiprocessing documentation

Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: It seems that it was this commit: https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5619ab2db3a6c62ffaa55e8826cf67b7459fc484 -- ___ Python tracker

[issue33858] A typo in multiprocessing documentation

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Doc fixes are routinely backported, when valid, at least within 3.x. If this was not, I could either be intention or accident. If the change in master was with a github PR, maybe someone just forgot the backport label. Is the change in 3.7? Can either of

[issue33826] enable discovery of class source code in IPython interactively defined classes

Ivan Pozdeev added the comment: I got that part, thank you. I can't get 1)what you're expecting as an output and 2)why this should work the way you're suggesting 'cuz functions and classes are very different. In particular, classes can be modified dynamically, unlike functions. So if you

[issue33826] enable discovery of class source code in IPython interactively defined classes

Thomas Viehmann added the comment: Apologies for not being clear. So I wrote: In IPython (or Jupyter), `inspect.getsource` is able to retrieve the source code for functions but not classes. By this I mean: import inspect class X: pass inspect.getsource(X) Note that: - it won't work in

[issue33847] doc: Add '@' operator entry to index

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset cd9ede6b20948af51f9a27b64bd0dfd8909c24f1 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.6': bpo-33847: Add '@' operator entry to index (GH-7669) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cd9ede6b20948af51f9a27b64bd0dfd8909c24f1 --

[issue33856] Type "help" is not present on win32

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33854] doc Add PEP title in seealso of Built-in Types

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7335 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33854] doc Add PEP title in seealso of Built-in Types

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset a9d0b34a5c5d4fdc12bba4f9c1e314e6e132cc65 by Terry Jan Reedy (Andrés Delfino) in branch 'master': bpo-33854: Add PEP 461 title to 'See also' note (GH-7688) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a9d0b34a5c5d4fdc12bba4f9c1e314e6e132cc65

[issue33854] doc Add PEP title in seealso of Built-in Types

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7334 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33832] Make "magic methods" a little more discoverable in the docs

Change by Fred L. Drake, Jr. : -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33847] doc: Add '@' operator entry to index

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset c05c0e045ccf6e065c59c193195dc0e9b7242dd4 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-33847: Add '@' operator entry to index (GH-7669) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c05c0e045ccf6e065c59c193195dc0e9b7242dd4 -- nosy:

[issue33832] Make "magic methods" a little more discoverable in the docs

Fred L. Drake, Jr. added the comment: Indeed, I did not. Fixed now. I hope. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33826] enable discovery of class source code in IPython interactively defined classes

Ivan Pozdeev added the comment: What do you mean by "class source code" anyway? A class doesn't actually contain any executable code (and there's no code object associated with it). -- ___ Python tracker

[issue33847] doc: Add '@' operator entry to index

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +7333 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

  1   2   >