Andrew Nester added the comment:
any conclusion on this? looks like it's a bit stuck
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Andrew Nester added the comment:
any conclusion on this? looks like it's a bit stuck
--
nosy: +andrewnester
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Andrew Nester added the comment:
so any feedback on this?
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29553>
___
___
Pyth
Andrew Nester added the comment:
>From my perspective current behaviour is a bit frustrate that's why it would
>be nice to have this issue fixed, but I would say it's critic one.
At the same time it doesn't introduce any BC breaking changes and kin
Andrew Nester added the comment:
any updates?
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29553>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Andrew Nester added the comment:
any updates?
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29573>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Andrew Nester added the comment:
any updates on this issue? looks like PR is ready to go
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Andrew Nester <andrew.nester@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +657
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Andrew Nester added the comment:
Thanks Serhiy! Just implemented new error messages in my PR for case you
mentioned.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Andrew Nester added the comment:
I've been investigating this issue and did not come up with some easy solution.
So the problem is:
os_symlink uses `path_error2` to throw exception.
the order of file arguments now is src then dest. For provided example src is
`a` and dest is `sym_link
Andrew Nester added the comment:
thanks Serhiy! just implemented your variant in my PR.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Andrew Nester added the comment:
yeah, I also thought about this too.
Something like 'pack_into requires a buffer of at least 6 bytes (size is 1,
offset is 5)'
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Andrew Nester <andrew.nester@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +354
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Andrew Nester added the comment:
Thanks! Just added PR fixing this.
--
nosy: +andrewnester
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Andrew Nester added the comment:
Thanks for reporting! Just added PR fixing this.
--
nosy: +andrewnester
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Andrew Nester <andrew.nester@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +326
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Andrew Nester added the comment:
JFYI, from my perspective as a developer PR 120 is more preferred one.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Andrew Nester added the comment:
some updates?
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29573>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Andrew Nester added the comment:
Adding new argument sucs as format= or compact= will make API more complicated.
In addition it's not easy and has obvious how to handle situations wheb we have
both separatots= and format= arguments set
Andrew Nester added the comment:
any updates on this? :)
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29573>
___
___
Pyth
Andrew Nester added the comment:
I've just added PR fixing this issue.
--
nosy: +andrewnester
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Andrew Nester <andrew.nester@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +96
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Andrew Nester added the comment:
any updates on this?
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29553>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Andrew Nester added the comment:
Ive just added alternative PR that drops inner brackets. So we've got options
to choose!
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Andrew Nester <andrew.nester@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +80
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Andrew Nester added the comment:
I've just added PR fixing this.
--
nosy: +andrewnester
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Andrew Nester <andrew.nester@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +76
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Andrew Nester added the comment:
I've just added PR implementing alternative version provided by R. David Murray
as more simple and straight-forward one.
--
nosy: +andrewnester
pull_requests: +53
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Andrew Nester added the comment:
thanks for your notes, it's absolutely fine and I agree with you :)
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Andrew Nester added the comment:
Agree about surprising behaviour but I guess it's better to fix it as other
issue because it could break BC in some cases. At least it needs to be
investigated.
For now I would like to stick with same behaviour for _decimal and _pydecimal
Andrew Nester added the comment:
actually, it's more related to subclassing, because the problem comes from the
fact that before the fix __init__ method receives value as int not Decimal if
int passed to from_float call.
That's why only subclasses of Decimal can see difference in arguments
Andrew Nester added the comment:
I've just added PR for this issue.
--
nosy: +andrewnester
pull_requests: +51
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
32 matches
Mail list logo
