New submission from Cal Leeming:
Originally posted here:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/33873243/1267398
The problem is caused by this line:
# For -m switch, just display the exception
info = str(exc)
Caused by the following commit in 2008;
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python
New submission from Cal Leeming:
There was a discussion/patch in #9754 [1].
This allows for multiple warning types as a tuple, e.g.;
self.assertWarnsRegex((DeprecationWarning, RuntimeWarning), ^E1000:)
However, it does not allow testing for multiple warning messages, e.g.;
expect
New submission from Cal Leeming:
There are several flags which can be provided to Sqlite3 during connection [1].
Alternative libraries such as apsw provide the ability to use these flags [2],
however it would be nice if `sqlite3` supported this out of the box.
Is there any reason why
New submission from Cal Leeming:
The documentation states that pkgutil.walk_packages() path must be None or a
list of paths [1]. After passing in a string, the result was a blank list
rather than a type error or automatic conversion to a list.
If this method is documented that it must only
Cal Leeming added the comment:
Any update on this? Still seems to be a problem as of 3.4.0.
--
nosy: +sleepycal
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16379
New submission from Cal Leeming:
Hello,
Today I came up against a strange problem where collisions were being
encountered after less than 1mil iterations when attempting to use
random.random().
After much digging, the problem was because I was casting my float to a string
Cal Leeming added the comment:
As stated before, I have already read this document.
This ticket is specifically about making users aware of this behaviour in the
form of a documentation update on the random.random() docs.
The link you provided does not exactly make this very clear
Cal Leeming added the comment:
Normally I would concur, but casting random.random() to a string is commonly
used, and people aren't going to read the entire floating point arithmetic page
to figure this out. And even if they do, that page still doesn't make it
entirely obvious at first read
Cal Leeming added the comment:
Many thanks for your lengthy response David.
Sorry, my initial bug report stated it was Python 2.7. The tests I performed
were actually on Python 2.6.6.
I will take a look at how to contribute documentation updates, and once I've
familiarized myself
Cal Leeming added the comment:
Actually, you do have a good point, this should have been using
random.getrandbits really.
--
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16609
Changes by Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
--
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16609
New submission from Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
Getting some extremely strange behavior when attempting to parse a fairly
standard CSV in Python 2.6.6.
I've tried a whole different mixture of dialects, quoting options, line
terminators etc, and none seem to get a happy
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Sorry, accidently pasted the wrong code snippet previously. The correct code
snippet is:
datx = open(data.txt, rb).read()
rows = csv.reader( datx )
for row in rows:
print x
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
This bug also seems to be showing in 2.7.3
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15407
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Okay, just found the reason for this.. It's because I was putting a .read() on
the file descriptor..
I really think that the CSVReader should raise an assertion in the event that
it is passed an object which has no iterator
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
@david Gotcha - I had a feeling that would be the case. Thank you for the quick
replies anyway guys! Hopefully this will help others in the future :)
--
___
Python tracker rep
New submission from Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
After a while of digging around, I noticed that the core libs don't provide an
easy way of splitting a list/tuple into chunks - as per the following
discussion:
http://www.aspwinhost.com/In-what-way-do-you-split-an-list
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Oh - and while we are at it - how about having merge_list() and unique_list()
as part of the core too??
def unique_list(seq): # Dave Kirby
# Order preserving
seen = set()
return [x for x in seq if x not in seen
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Thats full understandable that the default won't change. I'll put this in my
todo list to write a patch in a week or two.
On 1 Jul 2011 08:45, R. David Murray rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
New submission from Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
I came up against a problem today whilst trying to submit a request to a remote
API. The header needed to contain:
'Content-MD5' : md5here
But the urllib2 Request() forces capitalize() on all header names, and
transformed
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Sorry, I should clarify.. The str() patch worked, but it failed to work within
the realm of urllib2:
s = _str(Content-MD5)
print Builtin:
print plain: %s % ( s )
print capitalized: %s % ( s.capitalize() )
s = str
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
(short answer, I found the cause, and a suitable monkey patch) - below are
details of how I did it and steps I took.
-
Okay so I forked AbstractHTTPHandler() then patched do_request_(), at which
point request.headers
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
So @r.david.murray, it would appear you were right :D Really, I should have
looped through each method on str(), and wrapped them all to see which were
being called, but lesson learned I guess.
Sooo, I guess now the question
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Damn 3.3 huh? Ah well, at least it's in the pipeline ^_^
Thanks for your help on this @r.david.murray!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12455
New submission from Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
I believe I might have found a bug in the Python re libraries. Here is a
complete debug of what is happening (my apologies for the nature of the actual
text). I have ran this regex through RegexBuddy (and a few other tools
Changes by Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
--
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12325
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Take particular notice to the following:
\.co\.uk
or
literal 99
literal 111
literal 46
literal 117
literal 107
map(lambda x: chr(x), [99,111,46,117,107])
['c', 'o', '.', 'u', 'k']
It would
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Oh jeez, you're going to think I'm such an idiot. I just ran a completely fresh
test in the cli (away from the original source), and the issue disappeared (it
was caused by caching - apparently).
I'm really sorry to have
New submission from Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
If you attempt to call subprocess.check_output() on a file which is not
executable, it gives a file not found exception, rather than file not
executable. Took me about 3 hours to figure out why it kept saying the file
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Oh also, here is the version:
simplicitymedialtd@sws01.internal [~/webapps/cdn06.prod/src/webapp/cmd]
python
Python 2.7 Stackless 3.1b3 060516 (release27-maint, Aug 29 2010, 15:44:48)
[GCC 4.3.2] on linux2
Type help
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Yeah, I resolved the issue already. This bug report is focused primarily on the
(somewhat misleading) exception message given back.
I think it should at least include bad interpreter, otherwise it is a tad
misleading.
Cal
Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk added the comment:
Ah okay, shell=True is a good work around then :)
Thanks!
Cal
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12235
New submission from Cal Leeming cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk:
So, when you create a class like this:
class Obj:
children = []
The 'children' object essentially becomes shared across all instances of Obj.
To get around this, you have to use:
class Obj:
children = None
def
33 matches
Mail list logo
