Change by Jon Janzen :
--
nosy: +bigfootjon
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39732>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Jon Janzen :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +15694
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16074
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Jon Janzen :
There are a series of PEP8 violations in plistlib.
Most of them are spacing issues, a few naming issues, and also some unused
function parameters and unused imports that can be done away with.
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 352221
nosy
Jon Janzen added the comment:
>* Remove notes about the new API being added in 3.4 since 3.4 is no longer
>supported
Per discussion in the PR, this is no longer a goal of this issue
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from Jon Janzen :
* Update "Mac OS X" to "Apple" since plists are used more widely than just macOS
* Remove notes about the new API being added in 3.4 since 3.4 is no longer
supported
* Re-add the UID class documentation (oops, removed in issue36409)
-
Change by Jon Janzen :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Jon Janzen :
--
pull_requests: +15288
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15615
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
Jon Janzen added the comment:
Ah, I misinterpreted PEP4. I thought it only applied to modules as a whole
(e.g. plistlib) rather than individual functionality within that module. I'll
close my PR and wait until 3.9 is accepting patches
--
versions: +Python 3.9 -Python 3.8
Change by Jon Janzen :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +12466
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36409>
___
___
Py
New submission from Jon Janzen :
Per the documentation and in-line code warnings, the old API for plistlib was
deprecated in version 3.4. My understanding is that deprecated functionality is
to be removed in the next major version, so this code is long overdue for
removal
Jon Janzen added the comment:
I recently upgraded my python version and my hot-patch broke due to changes in
bpo-32072 (GH-4455).
It reminded me of this b.p.o., and after reading through the messages to remind
myself where the patch stood I realized that my tone friendly towards the end
Change by Jon Janzen :
--
pull_requests: +12152
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26707>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Jon Janzen <jjjonjan...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Ping
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26707>
___
__
Jon Janzen <jjjonjan...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Support for KeyedArchives are not limited to the Swift implementation I linked
to. They have been supported since Mac OS X since 10.2 (long before Swift came
around). The documentation
(https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foun
Jon Janzen <jjjonjan...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Ping
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26707>
___
__
Jon Janzen <jjjonjan...@gmail.com> added the comment:
@serhiy.storchaka: I've implemented a UID wrapper class
I've also updated the parser and writer classes to support the UID wrapper. The
implementations for reading/writing XML UID tags match the implementations
given by Apple's
Jon Janzen <jjjonjan...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Hello,
I have attached a file extracted from the database of the 2Do App for iOS and
macOS. The file contains information about tags used in the app.
plistlib cannot currently parse this file because it lacks the ability to read
byt
17 matches
Mail list logo
