[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2008-03-28 Thread Georg Brandl
Changes by Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2008-03-15 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Checking this in. All tests pass. Have for quite awhile. rev 61402. -- assignee: - skip.montanaro __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-12-09 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Okay, here's my latest patch (datetime-f.diff). 2.6 only at this point. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8901/datetime-f.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-12-09 Thread Skip Montanaro
Changes by Skip Montanaro: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file8438/dt-26.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-12-09 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Actually, I think I will avoid the 3.0 patch altogether and let these changes propagate from trunk to py3k by whoever works that magic. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-12-09 Thread Skip Montanaro
Changes by Skip Montanaro: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file8439/dt-30.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-12-09 Thread Skip Montanaro
Changes by Skip Montanaro: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file8901/datetime-f.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-12-09 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Stop me before I update it again! This update touches up datetime_strptime a bit. It's more uniform and a bit faster. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8907/datetime-f.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-17 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: In terms of strptime, I would just change _strptime.strptime() to _strptime._strptime() and have it return everything along with the microseconds measurement. Then have public functions that call that function and either strip off the microseconds or not. -Brett

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-17 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Brett In terms of strptime, I would just change _strptime.strptime() to Brett _strptime._strptime() and have it return everything along with Brett the microseconds measurement. Then have public functions that Brett call that function and either

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
Changes by Skip Montanaro: __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Here are new patches for 2.6 and 3.0 including changes to doc and test cases. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __Index: Lib/test/test_datetime.py

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
Changes by Skip Montanaro: __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-13 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: Are you going to add support to strptime as well? As for the 'time' module, I don't think it would be useful as it serves no purpose since the time tuple can't resolve to that resolution. If you do add support, though, I guess you just default to 0. --

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-13 Thread Eric V. Smith
Eric V. Smith added the comment: It's a nit, but there are a few other comments that should be changed to mention %f in addition to %z/%Z. * giving special meanings to the %z and %Z format codes via a preprocessing /* Scan the input format, looking for %z and %Z escapes, building

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-13 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Brett Are you going to add support to strptime as well? I looked at strptime for about two seconds then moved on. I presume you would know how to add it easily though. ;-) Brett As for the 'time' module, I don't think it would be useful as it serves

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-13 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Eric It's a nit, but there are a few other comments that should be Eric changed to mention %f in addition to %z/%Z. Yes, thanks. Skip __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1158

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-13 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: On 9/13/07, Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Skip Montanaro added the comment: Brett Are you going to add support to strptime as well? I looked at strptime for about two seconds then moved on. I presume you would know how to add it easily though.

[issue1158] %f format for datetime objects

2007-09-12 Thread Skip Montanaro
New submission from Skip Montanaro: Attached is a patch for py3k which adds a %f format code to its strftime method. When included in a format string it expands to the number of microseconds in the object. date, time and datetime objects all support the format (though I'm not sure what, if