[issue1229239] optionally allow mutable builtin types

2012-06-16 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: Greg, I am closing this because you seem to have found an alternate solution and have dropped the issue. If you do want to pursue a change for 3.4, I suggest you refresh your patch and post to python-ideas (new list since you posted this). As

[issue1229239] optionally allow mutable builtin types

2010-08-21 Thread Mark Lawrence
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk: -- stage: unit test needed - patch review versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1229239 ___

[issue1229239] optionally allow mutable builtin types

2009-02-17 Thread Greg Couch
Greg Couch gr...@cgl.ucsf.edu added the comment: FYI, I was able to work around this and use an unmodified Python by subtyping type and overriding the setattr method as shown below. It's a lot messier than patching Python. static int Mutable_SetAttr(PyObject *obj, PyObject *name, PyObject

[issue1229239] optionally allow mutable builtin types

2009-02-15 Thread Daniel Diniz
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com: -- stage: - test needed type: - feature request versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1229239 ___