Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Greg, I am closing this because you seem to have found an alternate solution
and have dropped the issue. If you do want to pursue a change for 3.4, I
suggest you refresh your patch and post to python-ideas (new list since you
posted this). As
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
stage: unit test needed - patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1229239
___
Greg Couch gr...@cgl.ucsf.edu added the comment:
FYI, I was able to work around this and use an unmodified Python by
subtyping type and overriding the setattr method as shown below. It's a
lot messier than patching Python.
static int
Mutable_SetAttr(PyObject *obj, PyObject *name, PyObject
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - test needed
type: - feature request
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1229239
___