[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2020-04-26 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: As all versions using the MSI installer are now out of support, I'm closing the issue. -- nosy: +zach.ware resolution: -> out of date stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2015-03-25 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: I'm not exactly sure how msiexec does its parsing, but it's possible that ALLUSERS=1 may not actually be the same as ALLUSERS=1. I use the latter regularly with most versions of Python in existence and it works fine. There may also be problems upgrading from the

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2015-03-17 Thread Doug Rohm
Doug Rohm added the comment: I realize this hasn't been commented on for a long time, but I'm noticing the same issue trying to do a silent install with the 3.4.3 x64 windows installer. The 3.4.2 x64 windows installer worked perfectly fine, but I can't seem to get the registry and add/remove

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-23 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: The difference may be the ALLUSERS=1 option. Windows Installer is supposed to auto-detect this when an installer is run as an admin, but maybe something in our authoring is preventing this detection? When I get a chance I'll try both and see if the logs show

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-23 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Steve: how is the auto-detection supposed to work, and what is the rationale? Shouldn't it be possible that even someone with administrator privileges still might want to install just for me? And how would they then specify that on the command line, given

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-23 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: It's described at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367559(v=vs.85).aspx, and frankly it is incredibly confusing. It is possible to reset ALLUSERS on the command line by specifying ALLUSERS= -- ___ Python

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-23 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Much of the text refers to Installer 5.0. msi.py currently targets installer 2.0. Does the auto-detection also work on such installers? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19351

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-23 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: No idea, TBH, though I'd guess that the behaviour comes from the installed version of Windows Installer and the database schema comes from the authored version. Nonetheless, if the solution is to add ALLUSERS=1 to the command line when doing silent all-user

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Jason: can you please report how exactly you attempted to perform the installation? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19351 ___

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: I cannot reproduce the issue. In an elevated terminal, I run msiexec /i python-3.4.1.amd64.msi /qn /l*v python.log ALLUSERS=1 Python installs fine, and does appear in the Remove programs panel. -- ___ Python

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-13 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: I've noticed this as well. I'm hoping to do a significant rework of the installer for 3.5 and will keep this in mind, but I honestly have no idea how to diagnose this in the current setup. Windows Installer is responsible for the missing entries, and AFAIK the

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-13 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: This may actually be a Windows issue... the keys for uninstall are being written to the Wow6432Node of the registry (on a 64-bit machine), and apparently the Programs and Features panel does not read them from there. The 64-bit installers should be fine (testing

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-13 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: Apparently keys in Wow6432Node are actually okay, so I'm not much closer to figuring this out. As far as I can tell, the entry I have for Python 2.6.6 (which doesn't appear) has identical information to IronPython 2.7.4 (which does appear). --

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-13 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: Okay, now it looks to me like the install that 'works' ran under the SYSTEM account while the one that didn't work ran under my (admin) user account. This may be caused by running the installer from an elevated command prompt. If it detects that it needs to

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2014-06-12 Thread Mark Lawrence
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk: -- nosy: +steve.dower versions: +Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19351 ___

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2013-10-22 Thread Jason Bray
New submission from Jason Bray: Hello, I am working in an IT group, attempting to automate our management of python. This issue applies to both Python 3.4 and Python 2.7.5 and Python 2.7.4 On a Windows machine (both 7 and 8.1 have been tested) when python msi's are installed from the command

[issue19351] python msi installers - silent mode

2013-10-22 Thread Christian Heimes
Changes by Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de: -- assignee: - loewis components: +Windows nosy: +loewis type: - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19351 ___