Berker Peksag added the comment:
The exception message has been updated to "TypeError: '<' not supported between
instances of 'Color' and 'Color'" in 0238eafb68da. Closing this as 'out of
date'.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
resolution: -> out of date
stage: -> resolved
status: open ->
R. David Murray added the comment:
I think 'please review' was directed at anyone, and yes, using the review link
is one way to do a review, but when there isn't enough line-by-line commenting
to make the code review tool worth using you can just post on the issue. (And
when you do use the
Mitchell Model added the comment:
Patch looks good to me. I like the choice to drop the parens. This is my first
time reviewing a change; did I go through the right mechanics? I clicked Review
on the issue's patch, looked at the diff, and a published a message similar to
this one. Was I
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
components: +Interpreter Core -ctypes
nosy: +ncoghlan
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20077
Gennadiy Zlobin added the comment:
I created a patch for it, please review
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +gennad
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file33281/20077.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20077
New submission from Mitchell Model:
[ctypes correct component for this?]
The TypeError messages given for incompatible types in comparison operators
differ from incompatible types in arithmetic operators. The arithmetic operator
error messages show the names of the types in single quotes,
