Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
This is not going to go anywhere for the present.
--
assignee: -> terry.reedy
resolution: -> rejected
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
Mark Roseman added the comment:
While the thing about asking for a favourite colour before switching to
advanced mode was a joke, I do sincerely believe that extensive progressive
disclosure techniques should be used to keep much of IDLE's features and
options hidden out of the box.
If the
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
In general, users and instructors are demanding more
options, not less.
This is correct. I teach Python classes using IDLE. It does NOT need to be
dumbed down (people has notepad for that). The API can be made more usable
but I am against this
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24810
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
Sounds patronizing.
Whether used for beginners to programming or experts, IDLE (or any other
application) should start with sensible defaults. As much as possible, it
should usefully start without requiring extra configuration. But beyond that,
actively
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
In general, users and instructors are demanding more options, not less.
'extensions' could be renamed 'plug-ins'. The current system could use some
rethinking, since the choice between a feature being 'built-in' versus a
'built-in extension' is at least
New submission from Mark Roseman:
To facilitate using IDLE to learn Python, and perhaps as a first experience
with programming altogether, and taking advantage of the fact that IDLE comes
with Python out of the box, I propose the following:
1. A new learning mode be introduced to Python. We
Changes by Yury Selivanov yseliva...@gmail.com:
--
versions: -Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24810
___
___