Robert Collins added the comment:
So - I'm with Victor and Raymond here. I think modifying difflib to provide
external control over the poor-O components would permit many more benefits
than just controlling time: you could wrap them in a timer module to get what
this patch does, you could
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
In general, it isn't good design to incorporate timeout logic in computation
logic. What would be better is a general purpose, reusable, decoupled tool:
run_with_time_limit(some_computation, some_args, time_limit). Such a tool
might be based on separate
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +tim.peters
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24904
___
___
New submission from John Taylor:
SequenceMatcher in the difflib module contain ratio() and quick_ratio() methods
which can take a long time to run with certain input. One example is two
slightly different versions of jquery.min.js.
I have written a patch against python-350b4 that adds a
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I'm not sure that it's a good idea to add a timeout to such algorithm. It can
be very surprising to have a difference result depending on the system load
(CPU usage of _other_ applications) and on the CPU performances.
If you really want this result, I would