[issue29257] Possible error in discussion of Abstract Base Classes and abstract properties

Change by Irit Katriel : -- stage: -> resolved status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue29257] Possible error in discussion of Abstract Base Classes and abstract properties

Irit Katriel added the comment: I think this is out of date, the example is different now: https://docs.python.org/3/library/abc.html#abc.abstractproperty -- nosy: +iritkatriel resolution: -> out of date status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker

[issue29257] Possible error in discussion of Abstract Base Classes and abstract properties

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29257] Possible error in discussion of Abstract Base Classes and abstract properties

New submission from Gerald Britton: I was rereading the 2.7 docs about abstract base classes the other day. I found this: "This defines a read-only property; you can also define a read-write abstract property using the ‘long’ form of property declaration:" along with an example. so I