[issue32143] os.statvfs lacks f_fsid

Fred L. Drake, Jr. added the comment: This has landed on master and will be part of Python 3.7. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue32143] os.statvfs lacks f_fsid

Fred L. Drake, Jr. added the comment: New changeset 96a5e50a5de3683b2afd6d680c7ecc4b525986f6 by Fred Drake (Giuseppe Scrivano) in branch 'master': bpo-32143: add f_fsid to os.statvfs() (#4571) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/96a5e50a5de3683b2afd6d680c7ecc4b525986f6

[issue32143] os.statvfs lacks f_fsid

Fred L. Drake, Jr. added the comment: I think Giuseppe's patch is good, but there's a Windows failure on AppVeyor, so I'm a little wary. It doesn't look related, but I haven't looked at Python on Windows since... 2001, maybe? --

[issue32143] os.statvfs lacks f_fsid

Change by Fred L. Drake, Jr. : -- nosy: +fdrake ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue32143] os.statvfs lacks f_fsid

Martin Panter added the comment: The doc string for the result object, and the main Python 2 documentation, both say that the result is a 10-tuple. So perhaps any new field should only be an attribute, and the tuple should stay the same size, to maintain compatibility.

[issue32143] os.statvfs lacks f_fsid

Change by Giuseppe Scrivano : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +4499 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue32143] os.statvfs lacks f_fsid

New submission from Giuseppe Scrivano : the os.statvfs() function doesn't return f_fsid. The POSIX definition of statvfs() has f_fsid: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/basedefs/sys/statvfs.h.html -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 307007 nosy: